Weekly irinotecan plus UFT and leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy of patients with advanced colorectal cancer

被引:12
作者
Méndez, M
Alfonso, PG
Pujol, E
González, E
Castañon, C
Cerezuela, P
López-Mateos, Y
Cruz, JJ
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Univ, Med Oncol Serv, Salamanca 37007, Spain
[2] Hosp Mostoles, Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Gen Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
[5] Hosp Virgen Nieves, Granada, Spain
[6] Hosp Virgen Blanca, Leon, Spain
[7] Hosp Naval Mediterraneo, Murcia, Spain
[8] Hosp Virgen Puerto, Plasencia, Spain
关键词
tegafur; uracil; CPT-11; colorectal cancer; elderly;
D O I
10.1007/s10637-005-6733-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We evaluated the antitumoral efficacy and safety of CPT-11 125 mg/m(2) (weekly 90 min i.v. infusion; days 1, 8 and 15) combined with UFT (oral combination of tegafur and uracil) 200 mg/m(2)/day plus leucovorin (LV) 45 mg/m(2)/day (both divided into three separate oral doses every 8 h, days 1-21) every 4 weeks as first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Fifty-three patients >= 18 years old with histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced CRC and bidimensionally measurable disease were enrolled. Three patients (6%) showed CR and 8 patients (15%) showed PR (ORR = 21% (95% CI, 10-32). Stable disease was reported in 19 patients (36%) [tumor control rate = 57% (95% CI, 43-70)]. The median time to progression and overall survival were 7.9 and 18.2 months, respectively (1-year rate = 74%; 2-years rate = 26%). CPT-11/UFT/LV treatment was well tolerated: the most reported grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (11% of patients) and delayed diarrhea (28% of patients). No significant differences in response rate, survival or toxicity were found between younger (>65 years) and older patients (> 65 years). Weekly CPT-11 plus UFT/LV was found effective and safe as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic CRC. The addition of CPT-11 to UFT/LV doubled the response rate compared to the results previously reported with UFT/LV, while myelosuppression remained low.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 251
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Abad A, 1997, Oncology (Williston Park), V11, P53
[2]   Phase I trial of weekly irinotecan combined with UFT as second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer [J].
Alonso, V ;
Escudero, P ;
Zorrilla, M ;
Isla, MD ;
Herrero, A ;
Mayordomo, JI ;
Martinez-Trufero, J ;
Sáenz, A ;
Tres, A ;
Antón, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 37 (18) :2385-2391
[3]  
ALONSO V, 2003, P AM SOC CLIN ONCOL, V22
[4]  
Bleiberg H, 2002, J CLIN ONCOL, V20, P1145, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.4.1145
[5]   Advanced colorectal cancer treatment in Europe: what have we achieved? [J].
Bleiberg, H ;
Hendlisz, A .
ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 2002, 13 (05) :461-471
[6]   Randomized comparative study of tegafur/uracil and oral leucovorin versus parenteral fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Carmichael, J ;
Popiela, T ;
Radstone, D ;
Falk, S ;
Borner, M ;
Oza, A ;
Skovsgaard, T ;
Munier, S ;
Martin, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (17) :3617-3627
[7]   Irinotecan is an active agent in untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Conti, JA ;
Kemeny, NE ;
Saltz, LB ;
Huang, Y ;
Tong, WP ;
Chou, TC ;
Sun, M ;
Pulliam, S ;
Gonzalez, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (03) :709-715
[8]  
Coutinho Anelisa K, 2003, Cancer Control, V10, P224
[9]  
CRUZ JJ, 2001, P AM SOC CLIN ONCOL, V20
[10]   Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Cunningham, D ;
Pyrhönen, S ;
James, RD ;
Punt, CJA ;
Hickish, TF ;
Heikkila, R ;
Johannesen, TB ;
Starkhammar, H ;
Topham, CA ;
Awad, L ;
Jacques, C ;
Herait, P .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9138) :1413-1418