Import Risks of Agricultural Products in Foreign Trade

被引:3
作者
Baranauskaite, Lina [1 ]
Jureviciene, Daiva [2 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Ctr Social Sci, Inst Econ & Rural Dev, LT-03220 Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Dept Econ Engn, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
import risks; agricultural products; agro-trade; food import; SAW; TOPSIS; geometric means; FOOD SECURITY; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY; COVID-19; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/economies9030102
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper aims to identify the main risk groups according to their significance on imports of agricultural products. After analysis of the scientific literature, eight groups of risks associated with agricultural products import were determined: supply risks, demand risks, production risks, management plus operational risks, logistical plus infrastructural risks, political risks, policy plus regulatory risks and financial risks. In order to assess the importance of all import risk groups, three Multicriteria decision support methods (MCDM)-SAW, TOPSIS and Geometric means-for expert evaluation are used. The article introduces a new import risks assessment framework CIRA (Country's Imports Risk Assessment) contributing to the systematic approach of a country's international trade risks management. The results order risk groups according to their importance in the following order: production (the most crucial risk group), logistical plus infrastructural, financial, management plus operational, political, supply, policy plus regulatory and demand risks.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Impact of COVID-19 on the food supply chain
    Aday, Serpil
    Aday, Mehmet Seckin
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY, 2020, 4 (04) : 167 - 180
  • [2] THE HEALTH TOLL OF IMPORT COMPETITION
    Adda, Jerome
    Fawaz, Yarine
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2020, 130 (630) : 1501 - 1540
  • [3] Attrey DP, 2017, FOOD SAFETY IN THE 21ST CENTURY: PUBLIC HEALTH PERSPECTIVE, P455, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-801773-9.00037-6
  • [4] Enhancing the assessment of critical resource use at the country level with the SCARCE method - Case study of Germany
    Bach, Vanessa
    Finogenova, Natalia
    Berger, Markus
    Winter, Lisa
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2017, 53 : 283 - 299
  • [5] Integrated method to assess resource efficiency - ESSENZ
    Bach, Vanessa
    Berger, Markus
    Henssler, Martin
    Kirchner, Martin
    Leiser, Stefan
    Mohr, Lisa
    Rother, Elmar
    Ruhland, Klaus
    Schneider, Laura
    Tikana, Ladji
    Volkhausen, Wolfgang
    Walachowicz, Frank
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 137 : 118 - 130
  • [6] Bachev H., 2017, Noble International Journal of Business and Management Research, V1, P10
  • [7] Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: state of the art and future research directions
    Baryannis, George
    Validi, Sahar
    Dani, Samir
    Antoniou, Grigoris
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2019, 57 (07) : 2179 - 2202
  • [8] Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models
    Behzadi, Golnar
    O'Sullivan, Michael Justin
    Olsen, Tava Lennon
    Zhang, Abraham
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 79 : 21 - 42
  • [9] The Proteus composite index: Towards a better metric for global food security
    Caccavale, Oscar Maria
    Giuffrida, Valerio
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 126
  • [10] Applications of WASPAS Method in Manufacturing Decision Making
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    [J]. INFORMATICA, 2014, 25 (01) : 1 - 20