Intelligent MPPT for photovoltaic panels using a novel fuzzy logic and artificial neural networks based on evolutionary algorithms

被引:95
作者
Fathi, Milad [1 ]
Parian, Jafar Amiri [1 ]
机构
[1] Bu Ali Sina Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Biosyst Engn, Hamadan 6517833131, Hamadan, Iran
关键词
Maximum power point tracking; Novel fuzzy logic; Artificial neural network; Meta-heuristic algorithms; POWER POINT TRACKING; SWARM OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM; SOLAR IRRADIATION; PV SYSTEMS; IMPLEMENTATION; PERFORMANCE; CONTROLLER; PREDICTION; RADIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2021.02.051
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) represents one of the significant challenges for designing photovoltaic (PV) systems. Thus, an effective MPPT method of solar panels is required to make them more efficient. Here, four intelligent methods have been applied for MPPT. Fuzzy logic (FL) has been used without the knowledge of an expert to create membership functions and rules. Also, the artificial neural network (ANN) has been employed based on three meta-heuristic algorithms, including genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, and imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA). The required data have been received from a solar panel and utilized in the designed systems in MATLAB software. In this case, the ambient temperature and irradiance were considered the systems' inputs, while the maximum power was regarded as the output. The systems' accuracy was evaluated using two statistical indices, root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). Additionally, they were compared based on stability, speed, and complexity. Eventually, the obtained results specified that the creatively designed fuzzy system provides faster, more accurate, and more stable performance than the other methods. It is also less complicated to implement. Regarding the hybrid methods, the results showed that the ANN-based on ICA is faster however more complicated in implementation compared to the ANN-based on PSO and GA. Yet, in terms of accuracy and stability, the hybrid methods are not significantly different. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1338 / 1348
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Agha HS, 2017, INT CONF INF COMMUN, P150, DOI 10.1109/ICICT.2017.8320180
[2]   Particle swarm optimization algorithm for optical-geometric optimization of linear fresnel solar concentrators [J].
Ajdad, H. ;
Baba, Y. Filali ;
Al Mers, A. ;
Merroun, O. ;
Bouatem, A. ;
Boutammachte, N. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 130 :992-1001
[3]   A novel maximum power point tracking technique based on fuzzy logic for photovoltaic systems [J].
Al-Majidi, Sadeq D. ;
Abbod, Maysam F. ;
A-Raweshidy, Hamed S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (31) :14158-14171
[4]  
Aleardi M., 2018, 37 CONV GRUPP NAZ GE
[5]   Maximum power point tracking using fuzzy logic control [J].
Algazar, Mohamed M. ;
AL-monier, Hamdy ;
Abd EL-Halim, Hamdy ;
Salem, Mohamed Ezzat El Kotb .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2012, 39 (01) :21-28
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, INT J ENG TRENDS TEC
[7]   An implementation of artificial neural-network potentials for atomistic materials simulations: Performance for TiO2 [J].
Artrith, Nongnuch ;
Urban, Alexander .
COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2016, 114 :135-150
[8]   A hybrid firefly and particle swarm optimization algorithm for computationally expensive numerical problems [J].
Aydilek, Ibrahim Berkan .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 66 :232-249
[9]   Hybrid maximum power point tracking algorithm with improved dynamic performance [J].
Bahrami, Milad ;
Gavagsaz-Ghoachani, Roghayeh ;
Zandi, Majid ;
Phattanasak, Matheepot ;
Maranzanaa, Gael ;
Nahid-Mobarakeh, Babak ;
Pierfederici, Serge ;
Meibody-Tabar, Farid .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 130 :982-991
[10]   Comparison of fuzzy logic and neural network in maximum power point tracker for PV systems [J].
Ben Salah, Chokri ;
Ouali, Mohamed .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2011, 81 (01) :43-50