Economic evaluation of skin cancer prevention in Australia

被引:79
作者
Shih, Sophy Ting-Fang [1 ]
Carter, Rob [1 ]
Sinclair, Craig [2 ]
Mihalopoulos, Cathrine [1 ]
Vos, Theo [3 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Fac Hlth Med Nursing & Behav Sci, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
[2] Canc Council Victoria, Canc Prevent Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Populat Hlth, Ctr Burden Dis & Cost Effectiveness, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Skin neoplasms; Primary prevention; Cost-effectiveness; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; VITAMIN-D; SUN EXPOSURE; MELANOMA; HEALTH; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.09.008
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. Australia has the highest incidence of skin cancer in the world, despite prevention campaigns being implemented since the early 1980s. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of a skin cancer prevention program (named SunSmart) since it was introduced, together with its potential cost-effectiveness as an upgraded and ongoing national program. Methods. The reduction in melanoma incidence attributable to SunSmart was modelled as the primary end-point. Historical expenditures on SunSmart were obtained from representative Australian states in three latitude zones. Melanoma incidence rates from these states were used to model key health outcomes. Non-melanoma skin cancer was modelled separately based on national survey results. Results. We estimate that SunSmart has averted 28,000 disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), equivalent to 22,000 life-years saved, in the state of Victoria since its introduction in 1988, as well as saving money from cost offset in skin cancer management (dominant). An upgraded national program for the next 20 years is estimated to avert 120,000 DALYs, with associated reductions in the use of health care resources. it remains a dominant intervention in which every dollar invested in SunSmart will return an estimated AU$2.30. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that a sustained modest investment in skin cancer control is likely to be an excellent value for money. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 453
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
*AIHW, 2005, AIHW HLTH WELF EXP S, V22
[2]   The cost-effectiveness of cervical screening in Australia: what is the impact of screening at different intervals or over a different age range? [J].
Anderson, Rob ;
Haas, Marion ;
Shanahan, Marian .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 32 (01) :43-52
[3]  
BEGG S, 2007, 82 PHE AIHW
[4]  
Cancer Council Australia, 2007, RISKS BEN SUN EXP PO
[5]   Could a national skin cancer primary prevention campaign in Australia be worthwhile?: an economic perspective [J].
Carter, R ;
Marks, R ;
Hill, D .
HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 14 (01) :73-82
[6]  
CARTER R, 1993, AUST J PUBLIC HEALTH, V17, P42
[7]  
Carter Rob, 2008, Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, V8, P593, DOI 10.1586/14737167.8.6.593
[8]  
DOBBINSON S, 2005, SUN PROTECTION SUNBU
[9]   Weekend sun protection and sunburn in Australia: Trends (1987-2002) and association with SunSmart television advertising [J].
Dobbinson, Suzanne J. ;
Wakefield, Melanie A. ;
Jamsen, Kris M. ;
Herd, Natalie L. ;
Spittal, Matthew J. ;
Lipscomb, John E. ;
Hill, David J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 34 (02) :94-101
[10]  
Drummond MF, 2005, Methods for The Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes