Student Perceptions of Remote Chemistry Lecture Delivery Methods

被引:14
作者
Accettone, Shannon L. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Trent Univ, Dept Chem, Peterborough, ON K9L 0G2, Canada
关键词
General Public; First-Year Undergraduate/General; Upper-Division Undergraduate; Interdisciplinary/Multidisciplinary; Internet/Web-Based Learning; Distance Learning/Self Instruction; Applications of Chemistry; Student-Centered Learning; Chemical Education Research; HIGHER-EDUCATION; ONLINE; ENGAGEMENT; ATTENDANCE; TIME;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00758
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Beginning in March 2020, instructors and students in educational institutions across the world have had to adapt to new virtual methods of teaching and learning. This study focused on obtaining the student perspective of remote chemistry lecture delivery methods across 13 Fall 2020 courses with students in varied majors of study and stages of degree completion. For students who experienced a mixture of asynchronous and synchronous content delivery within the same course, a majority of students preferred the asynchronous model. When all student participants were asked which content delivery model they would prefer, should remote learning continue, the majority of students indicated that a hybrid mixture of both asynchronous and synchronous opportunities would best support their learning. This was followed by a fully asynchronous model with fully synchronous being least preferred. While students in all years of study showed a preference for the hybrid model with even preferences for fully asynchronous and synchronous models, second-year students were more likely to select asynchronous learning over synchronous. For courses providing recorded synchronous content, the majority of students attended the live class, while a significant portion also made further use of the provided recordings, suggesting recorded content may be worth pursuing for future remote or in-person courses.
引用
收藏
页码:3667 / 3679
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Teaching Chemistry in the Time of COVID-19: Memories and the Classroom [J].
Aguirre, J. Dafhne ;
Selampinar, Fatma .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 97 (09) :2909-2912
[2]   Insights and Initiatives While Teaching Organic Chemistry I and II with Laboratory Courses in the Time of COVID-19 [J].
Anzovino, Mary E. ;
Mallia, V. Ajay ;
Morton, Michael S. ;
Paredes, Julia E. Barker ;
Pennington, Richard ;
Pursell, David P. ;
Rudd, Gillian E. A. ;
Shepler, Benjamin ;
Villanueva, Omar ;
Lee, Seungjin .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 97 (09) :3240-3245
[3]   Maintaining an Active Organic Class during the COVID-Induced Online Transition at Two Undergraduate Institutions [J].
Baker, Aaron J. ;
Dannatt, Jonathan E. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 97 (09) :3235-3239
[4]   Change in Strategies to Enhance Student Engagement during the Spring 2020 COVID-19 Shutdown in a Nonmajor Chemistry Class [J].
Budy, Beatrix .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 97 (09) :3153-3157
[5]   How the COVID-19 Pandemic Changed Chemistry Instruction at a Large Public University in the Midwest: Challenges Met, (Some) Obstacles Overcome, and Lessons Learned [J].
Burnett, Joseph W. ;
Burke, K. A. ;
Stephens, Nicole M. ;
Bose, Ishani ;
Bonaccorsi, Cristina ;
Wade, Adam M. ;
Awino, Joseph K. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 97 (09) :2793-2799
[6]   Dissecting the Flipped Classroom: Using a Randomized Controlled Trial Experiment to Determine When Student Learning Occurs [J].
Casselman, Matthew D. ;
Atit, Kinnari ;
Henbest, Grace ;
Guregyan, Cybill ;
Mortezaei, Kiana ;
Eichler, Jack F. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 97 (01) :27-35
[7]   Australian university students' access to web-based lecture recordings and the relationship with lecture attendance and academic performance [J].
Chapin, Laurie A. .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 34 (05) :1-12
[8]   Implications for the Use of PowerPoint, Classroom Response Systems, Teams, and Whiteboard to Enhance Online Teaching of Chemistry Subjects in Community College [J].
Chiu, Wang-Kin .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 97 (09) :3135-3139
[9]   Ten best practices for taking experiential learning online [J].
Cridland, Caitlin ;
Drape, Tiffany ;
Marine, Sasha ;
Gillaspy, Glenda .
BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2021, 49 (01) :9-14
[10]   Challenges in Teaching Organic Chemistry Remotely [J].
Crucho, Carina I. C. ;
Avo, Joao ;
Diniz, Ana M. ;
Gomes, Mario J. S. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 97 (09) :3211-3216