The Case for a Bayesian Approach to Benefit-Risk Assessment:: Overview and Future Directions

被引:6
作者
Costa, Maria J. [1 ]
He, Weili [2 ]
Jemiai, Yannis [3 ]
Zhao, Yueqin [4 ]
Di Casoli, Carl [5 ]
机构
[1] GlaxoSmithKline, Clin Stat, Bldg 3,3F120,Gunnels Wood Rd, Stevenage SG1 2NY, Herts, England
[2] Merck & Co Inc, Clin Biostat, Kenilworth, NJ USA
[3] Cytel Inc, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] US FDA, Div Biometr 7, Off Biostat, OTS,CDER, Silver Spring, MD USA
[5] Dept Biostat, Celgene, NJ USA
关键词
benefit-risk; Bayesian inference; decision-making; uncertainty; METHODOLOGIES; EFFICACY; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1177/2168479017698190
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
The benefit-risk assessment of a new medicinal product or intervention is one of the most complex tasks that sponsors, regulators, payers, physicians, and patients face. Therefore, communicating the trade-off of benefits and risks in a clear and transparent manner, using all available evidence, is critical to ensure that the best decisions are made. Several quantitative methods have been proposed in recent years that try to provide insight into this challenging problem. Bayesian inference, with its coherent approach for integrating different sources of information and uncertainty, along with its links to optimal decision theory, provides a natural framework to perform quantitative assessments of the benefit-risk trade-off. This paper describes the current state of the art in Bayesian methodologies for quantitative benefit-risk assessment, and how these may be leveraged throughout the life cycle of a medicinal product to support and augment clinical judgment and qualitative benefit-risk assessments. Gaps and potential new directions that extend the current approaches are also identified.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 574
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Benefit-Risk Analysis for Decision-Making: An Approach
    Raju, G. K.
    Gurumurthi, K.
    Domike, R.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 100 (06) : 654 - 671
  • [22] FDA's Benefit-Risk Framework for Human Drugs and Biologics: Role in Benefit-Risk Assessment and Analysis of Use for Drug Approvals
    Lackey, Leila
    Thompson, Graham
    Eggers, Sara
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2021, 55 (01) : 170 - 179
  • [23] A Quantitative Approach for Benefit-Risk Assessment Using Stochastic Multi-Criteria Discriminatory Method
    Wang, Yaping
    Mai, Yabing
    He, Weili
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 8 (04): : 373 - 378
  • [24] The Brighton collaboration standardized module for vaccine benefit-risk assessment
    Levitan, Bennett
    Hadler, Stephen C.
    Hurst, William
    Izurieta, Hector S.
    Smith, Emily R.
    Baker, Nicole L.
    Bauchau, Vincent
    Chandler, Rebecca
    Chen, Robert T.
    Craig, Danielle
    King, Jay
    Pitisuttithum, Punnee
    Strauss, Walter
    Tomczyk, Sylvie
    Zafack, Joseline
    Kochhar, Sonali
    VACCINE, 2024, 42 (04) : 972 - 986
  • [25] Benefit-Risk Assessment of Plecanatide in the Treatment of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
    Miner, Philip B., Jr.
    DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 42 (05) : 603 - 615
  • [26] Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment: State of the Practice Within Industry
    Smith, Meredith Y.
    van Til, Janine
    DiSantostefano, Rachael L.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marsh, Kevin
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2021, 55 (02) : 415 - 425
  • [27] Benefit-Risk Assessment of Becaplermin in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
    Papanas, Nikolaos
    Maltezos, Efstratios
    DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 33 (06) : 455 - 461
  • [28] Benefit-risk assessment of pitavastatin for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in older patients
    Chamberlin, Kevin W.
    Baker, William L.
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2015, 10 : 733 - 740
  • [29] A Longitudinal Model and Graphic for Benefit-risk Analysis, With Case Study
    Norton, Jonathan D.
    DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2011, 45 (06): : 741 - 747
  • [30] Emerging Good Practices for Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment: A Step Forward
    Ghabri, Salah
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (04) : 447 - 448