CT and NIR imaging of abdominal liposarcoma

被引:79
作者
Kim, T
Murakami, T
Oi, H
Tsuda, K
Matsushita, M
Tomoda, K
Fukuda, H
Nakamura, H
机构
[1] OSAKA TEISHIN HOSP,DEPT RADIOL,OSAKA 543,JAPAN
[2] OSAKA UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT PATHOL,SUITA,OSAKA 565,JAPAN
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.166.4.8610559
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. CT and MR images were reviewed to correlate the histologic subtypes of abdominal liposarcoma with the radiologic findings. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Ten patients with liposarcoma who underwent CT or MR imaging before surgery were included in this study, CT and MR imaging findings for these patients were compared retrospectively with histologic findings. RESULTS. Major histologic subtypes found in our group of patients were five well-differentiated, three myxoid, one pleomorphic, and one round-cell liposarcomas. The well-differentiated subtype consisted of lipoma-like and/or sclerosing components. The predominant attenuation and signal intensity characteristics of the lipoma-like components on CT and MR images resembled those of fat, whereas the predominant attenuation and signal intensity characteristics of the sclerosing components resembled those of muscle. The myxoid subtype showed, on unenhanced images, predominant attenuation and signal intensity characteristics that resembled those of water; on contrast-enhanced images, this subtype showed gradual reticular enhancement. The appearance of the round-cell and pleomorphic subtypes was that of heterogeneous, nonfatty tumors, Their characteristics were indistinguishable from those of other malignant soft-tissue masses. CONCLUSION. Each histologic subtype of abdominal liposarcoma showed different CT attenuation or MR imaging signal intensity characteristics. A clear understanding of these findings should prove helpful in the diagnosis of liposarcoma.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 833
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   VALUE OF MR IMAGING IN DIFFERENTIATING BENIGN FROM MALIGNANT SOFT-TISSUE MASSES - STUDY OF 95 LESIONS [J].
BERQUIST, TH ;
EHMAN, RL ;
KING, BF ;
HODGMAN, CG ;
ILSTRUP, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (06) :1251-1255
[2]  
DESANTOS LA, 1981, CANCER, V47, P46, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:1<46::AID-CNCR2820470110>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-X
[4]   LIPOMATOUS TUMORS AND TUMORS WITH FATTY COMPONENT - MR IMAGING POTENTIAL AND COMPARISON OF MR AND CT RESULTS [J].
DOOMS, GC ;
HRICAK, H ;
SOLLITTO, RA ;
HIGGINS, CB .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 157 (02) :479-483
[5]  
ENTERLINE HT, 1960, CANCER, V13, P932, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(196009/10)13:5<932::AID-CNCR2820130512>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-S
[7]  
ENZINGER FM, 1988, SOFT TISSUE TUMORS, P346
[8]  
Evans HL, 1988, SURG PATHOL, V1, P41
[9]   COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY OF ABDOMINAL FATTY MASSES [J].
FRIEDMAN, AC ;
HARTMAN, DS ;
SHERMAN, J ;
LAUTIN, EM ;
GOLDMAN, M .
RADIOLOGY, 1981, 139 (02) :415-429
[10]   LIPOSARCOMA OF THE EXTREMITIES - MR AND CT FINDINGS IN THE HISTOLOGIC SUBTYPES [J].
JELINEK, JS ;
KRANSDORF, MJ ;
SHMOOKLER, BM ;
ABOULAFIA, AJ ;
MALAWER, MM .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (02) :455-459