Functional tests should be accentuated more in the decision for ACL reconstruction

被引:48
作者
Eitzen, Ingrid [1 ,2 ]
Moksnes, Havard [3 ]
Snyder-Mackler, Lynn [4 ]
Engebretsen, Lars [5 ,6 ]
Risberg, May Arna [3 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, NAR, Dept Orthopaed, N-0705 Oslo, Norway
[2] NAR Hjelp24NIMI UIlevaal, Hjelp24NIMI, N-0705 Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, NAR, Norwegian Sch Sport Sci, Hjelp24NIMI, N-0705 Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Delaware, Dept Phys Therapy, Newark, DE USA
[5] Oslo Univ Hosp, NAR, Dept Orthopaed, Norwegian Sch Sport Sci, N-0705 Oslo, Norway
[6] Univ Oslo, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Knee injury; ACL; Surgery; Knee function; Functional tests; Screening examination; CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; QUADRICEPS STRENGTH; PROSPECTIVE TRIAL; ANTERIOR; MANAGEMENT; PATIENT; REHABILITATION; INDIVIDUALS; STABILITY; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-010-1113-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
A high pre-injury activity level, the desire of the patient to continue pivoting sports and fear of future give-way episodes are considered the most significant factors affecting the decision to perform anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. However, since the functional status of the knee at the time of surgery affects the final outcome, assessments of knee function should be considered in the decision making for surgery. Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury can be classified as potential copers or non-copers from an existing screening examination. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the functional tests incorporated in the original screening examination could contribute to explain those who later go through anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and to examine whether changes to the content or the time of conducting the screening examination (before or after ten sessions of exercise therapy) could improve its explanatory value. One-hundred and forty-five individuals were included and prospectively followed for 15 months, after where 51% had gone through anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 49% were managed non-operatively. The only significant baseline differences between those who later went through anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and those who were non-operatively treated were that those who had surgery were younger and had a higher activity level (P < 0.05). Regression analyses revealed that the explanatory value for those who later went through anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction significantly improved when the original screening examination was considered compared to only age, activity level and give-way episodes. Changes to the content further improved the explanatory value, with quadriceps muscle strength as the single variable with the highest impact. Finally, conducting the screening examination after ten sessions of progressive exercise therapy gave the overall highest explanatory values, suggesting that the screening examination should be conducted subsequent to a short period of rehabilitation to inform decision making for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:1517 / 1525
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Literature Review of the Anatomy, Biomechanics, Surgical Considerations, and Clinical Outcomes [J].
Beasley, Leslie S. ;
Weiland, Daniel E. ;
Vidal, Armando F. ;
Chhabra, Anikar ;
Herzka, Andrea S. ;
Feng, Matthew T. ;
West, Robin, V .
OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 15 (01) :5-19
[2]   Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part I [J].
Beynnon, BD ;
Johnson, RJ ;
Abate, JA ;
Fleming, BC ;
Nichols, CE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (10) :1579-1602
[3]  
Cook C, 2008, EUR J PHYS REHAB MED, V44, P253
[4]   FATE OF THE ACL-INJURED PATIENT - A PROSPECTIVE OUTCOME STUDY [J].
DANIEL, DM ;
STONE, ML ;
DOBSON, BE ;
FITHIAN, DC ;
ROSSMAN, DJ ;
KAUFMAN, KR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1994, 22 (05) :632-644
[5]   Functional assessment and muscle strength before and after reconstruction of chronic anterior cruciate ligament lesions [J].
de Jong, Suzanne N. ;
van Caspel, Danny R. ;
van Haeff, Michiel J. ;
Saris, Daniel B. F. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 23 (01) :21-28
[6]  
Dvir Z., 2004, ISOKINETICS MUSCLE T
[7]   Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers [J].
Eastlack, ME ;
Axe, MJ ;
Snyder-Mackler, L .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1999, 31 (02) :210-215
[8]   Preoperative quadriceps strength is a significant predictor of knee function two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Eitzen, I. ;
Holm, I. ;
Risberg, M. A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 43 (05) :371-376
[9]   Prospective trial of a treatment algorithm for the management of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee [J].
Fithian, DC ;
Paxton, EW ;
Stone, ML ;
Luetzow, WF ;
Csintalan, RP ;
Phelan, D ;
Daniel, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (03) :335-346
[10]   A decision-making scheme for returning patients to high-level activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture [J].
Fitzgerald, GK ;
Axe, MJ ;
Snyder-Mackler, L .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2000, 8 (02) :76-82