Building thermal load prediction through shallow machine learning and deep learning

被引:320
作者
Wang, Zhe [1 ]
Hong, Tianzhen [1 ]
Piette, Mary Ann [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Bldg Technol & Urban Syst Div, One Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
Building cooling load; Prediction; Weather forecast uncertainty; XGBoost; Deep learning; LSTM; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; DATA-FUSION; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; DEMAND; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; NORMALITY; NETWORK; HEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114683
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Building thermal load prediction informs the optimization of cooling plant and thermal energy storage. Physics-based prediction models of building thermal load are constrained by the model and input complexity. In this study, we developed 12 data-driven models (7 shallow learning, 2 deep learning, and 3 heuristic methods) to predict building thermal load and compared shallow machine learning and deep learning. The 12 prediction models were compared with the measured cooling demand. It was found XGBoost (Extreme Gradient Boost) and LSTM (Long Short Term Memory) provided the most accurate load prediction in the shallow and deep learning category, and both outperformed the best baseline model, which uses the previous day's data for prediction. Then, we discussed how the prediction horizon and input uncertainty would influence the load prediction accuracy. Major conclusions are twofold: first, LSTM performs well in short-term prediction (1 h ahead) but not in long term prediction (24 h ahead), because the sequential information becomes less relevant and accordingly not so useful when the prediction horizon is long. Second, the presence of weather forecast uncertainty deteriorates XGBoost's accuracy and favors LSTM, because the sequential information makes the model more robust to input uncertainty. Training the model with the uncertain rather than accurate weather data could enhance the model's robustness. Our findings have two implications for practice. First, LSTM is recommended for short-term load prediction given that weather forecast uncertainty is unavoidable. Second, XGBoost is recommended for long term prediction, and the model should be trained with the presence of input uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   A review of data-driven building energy consumption prediction studies [J].
Amasyali, Kadir ;
El-Gohary, Nora M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 81 :1192-1205
[2]  
American Society of Heating V. and Air Conditioning Engineers, 2002, ASHRAE GUIDEL 14 201
[3]   ASYMPTOTIC THEORY OF CERTAIN GOODNESS OF FIT CRITERIA BASED ON STOCHASTIC PROCESSES [J].
ANDERSON, TW ;
DARLING, DA .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1952, 23 (02) :193-212
[4]  
[Anonymous], ASHRAE T 1
[5]  
[Anonymous], DEEP LEARNING PYTHON
[6]  
[Anonymous], SCALABLE PORTABLE DI
[7]   Practical factors of envelope model setup and their effects on the performance of model predictive control for building heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems [J].
Blum, D. H. ;
Arendt, K. ;
Rivalin, L. ;
Piette, M. A. ;
Wetter, M. ;
Veje, C. T. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 236 :410-425
[8]   An inverse gray-box model for transient building load prediction [J].
Braun, JE ;
Chaturvedi, N .
HVAC&R RESEARCH, 2002, 8 (01) :73-99
[9]   XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System [J].
Chen, Tianqi ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, :785-794
[10]   Modeling heating and cooling loads by artificial intelligence for energy-efficient building design [J].
Chou, Jui-Sheng ;
Bui, Dac-Khuong .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 82 :437-446