Gut Check: Reappraisal of Disgust Helps Explain Liberal-Conservative Differences on Issues of Purity

被引:35
作者
Feinberg, Matthew [1 ]
Antonenko, Olga [2 ]
Willer, Robb [3 ]
Horberg, E. J. [4 ]
John, Oliver P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Ctr Compass & Altruism Res & Educ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Psychol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Sociol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Sociol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
disgust; emotion regulation; morality; political attitudes; conservatism; EMOTION REGULATION; POLITICAL CONSERVATISM; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MORAL JUDGMENTS; SENSITIVITY; MEDIATION; SCALE;
D O I
10.1037/a0033727
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Disgust plays an important role in conservatives' moral and political judgments, helping to explain why conservatives and liberals differ in their attitudes on issues related to purity. We examined the extent to which the emotion-regulation strategy reappraisal drives the disgust-conservatism relationship. We hypothesized that disgust has less influence on the political and moral judgments of liberals because they tend to regulate disgust reactions through emotional reappraisal more than conservatives. Study 1a found that a greater tendency to reappraise disgust was negatively associated with conservatism, independent of disgust sensitivity. Study 1b replicated this finding, demonstrating that the effect of reappraisal is unique to disgust. In Study 2, liberals condemned a disgusting act less than conservatives, and did so to the extent that they reappraised their initial disgust response. Study 3 manipulated participants' use of reappraisal when exposed to a video of men kissing. Conservatives instructed to reappraise their emotional reactions subsequently expressed more support for same-sex marriage than conservatives in the control condition, demonstrating attitudes statistically equivalent to liberal participants.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 521
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Aubin ED, 1996, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V71, P152
[2]  
Brehm Sharon S., 2013, Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control
[3]   On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication [J].
Dillard, JP ;
Shen, LJ .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 2005, 72 (02) :144-168
[4]   A Bad Taste in the Mouth: Gustatory Disgust Influences Moral Judgment [J].
Eskine, Kendall J. ;
Kacinik, Natalie A. ;
Prinz, Jesse J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (03) :295-299
[5]   Liberating Reason From the Passions: Overriding Intuitionist Moral Judgments Through Emotion Reappraisal [J].
Feinberg, Matthew ;
Willer, Robb ;
Antonenko, Olga ;
John, Oliver P. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (07) :788-795
[6]  
Graham J., 2013, WARNING BELL L UNPUB
[7]   Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations [J].
Graham, Jesse ;
Haidt, Jonathan ;
Nosek, Brian A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 96 (05) :1029-1046
[8]  
Gross J. J., HDB EMOTION REGULATI
[9]   Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being [J].
Gross, JJ ;
John, OP .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 85 (02) :348-362
[10]   Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology [J].
Gross, JJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (01) :224-237