Motoneuron pool excitability of hemiplegic patients: Assessing recovery stages by using H-reflex and M response

被引:37
作者
Higashi, T
Funase, K
Kusano, K
Tabira, T
Harada, N
Sakakibara, A
Yoshimura, T
机构
[1] Nagasaki Univ, Sch Allied Med Sci, Nagasaki 8528520, Japan
[2] Nagasaki N Hosp, Nagasaki, Japan
[3] Inoue Hosp, Nagasaki, Japan
[4] Nagasaki Univ, Univ Hosp, Nagasaki 852, Japan
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2001年 / 82卷 / 11期
关键词
H-reflex; motor neurons; recovery of function; rehabilitation; spasticity;
D O I
10.1053/apmr.2001.25081
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the excitability of the motoneuron pools of both the spastic and the unimpaired sides of patients with hemiplegia with a new method by using H-reflexes and M responses. The method determines the ratio of the developmental slope of the H-reflex (Hslp) to the slope of the M response (Mslp). We also examined the relation between the Brunnstrom stages and the Hslp/Mslp. Design: Experiment. Setting: Electrophysiologic experimental laboratory in a Japanese medical school. Patients: Fifteen hemiplegic patients (9 men. 6 women age range, 48-71 yr; mean, 60yr) with spasticity caused by a stroke. Interventions: The subject was instructed to relax while seated in a reclining chair with his foot fixed on an immobile pedal. After the soleus H-reflex and M responses on one side were recorded. the same experimental procedures were carried out on the other side. Main Outcome Measures: Hslp/Mslp Brunnstrom stages. Results: Hslp/Mslp had better predictive value than conventional indicators of motoneuron pool excitability. Hslp/Mslp appeared to be a better match for the bell-shaped pattern of the Brunnstrom stages. Conclusion: Hs1p/Mslp is the preferred index for evaluating the motoneuron pool excitability of the spastic side of hemiplegic patients. (C) 2001 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:1604 / 1610
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, SPASTICITY MECH MANA
[2]   SEGMENTAL REFLEX PATHWAYS IN SPINAL SHOCK AND SPINAL SPASTICITY IN MAN [J].
ASHBY, P ;
VERRIER, M ;
LIGHTFOOT, E .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1974, 37 (12) :1352-1360
[3]   NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION FOR THE HEAD-INJURED PATIENT [J].
BAKER, LL ;
PARKER, K ;
SANDERSON, D .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1983, 63 (12) :1967-1974
[4]   RECIPROCAL IA INHIBITION IN PATIENTS WITH SPINAL SPASTICITY [J].
BOORMAN, G ;
HULLIGER, M ;
LEE, RG ;
TAKO, K ;
TANAKA, R .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1991, 127 (01) :57-60
[5]  
BRUNNSTROM S., 1970, MOVEMENT THERAPY HEM
[6]  
Burke D, 1983, Adv Neurol, V39, P133
[7]  
CRONE C, 1990, EXP BRAIN RES, V81, P35
[8]  
DELWAIDE PJ, 1973, NEW DEV ELECTROMYOGR, V3, P296
[9]   A QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PRESYNAPTIC INHIBITION OF IA AFFERENTS IN SPASTICS - DIFFERENCES IN HEMIPLEGICS AND PARAPLEGICS [J].
FAIST, M ;
MAZEVET, D ;
DIETZ, V ;
PIERROTDESEILLIGNY, E .
BRAIN, 1994, 117 :1449-1455
[10]  
Funase K, 1994, Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, V34, P477