The need for anticoagulation following inferior vena cava filter placement: Systematic review

被引:40
作者
Ray, Charles E., Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Prochazka, Allan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Denver & Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiol, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado Denver & Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Clin Sci, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gen Internal Med, Aurora, CO USA
[4] Denver VA Med Ctr, Dept Ambulatory Care, Denver, CO USA
关键词
anticoagulation; evidence-based medicine; IVC filters; venous interruption;
D O I
10.1007/s00270-007-9244-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To perform a systemic review to determine the effect of anticoagulation on the rates of venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolus, deep venous thrombosis, inferior vena cava (IVC) filter thrombosis) following placement of an IVC filter. Methods A comprehensive computerized literature search was performed to identify relevant articles. Data were abstracted by two reviewers. Studies were included if it could be determined whether or not subjects received anticoagulation following filter placement, and if follow-up data were presented. A meta-analysis of patients from all included studies was performed. A total of 14 articles were included in the final analysis, but the data from only nine articles could be used in the meta-analysis; five studies were excluded because they did not present raw data which could be analyzed in the meta-analysis. A total of 1,369 subjects were included in the final meta-analysis. Results The summary odds ratio for the effect of anticoagulation on venous thromboembolism rates following filter deployment was 0.639 (95% CI 0.351 to 1.159, p = 0.141). There was significant heterogeneity in the results from different studies [Q statistic of 15.95 (p = 0.043)]. Following the meta-analysis, there was a trend toward decreased venous thromboembolism rates in patients with post-filter anticoagulation (12.3% vs. 15.8%), but the result failed to reach statistical significance. Conclusion Inferior vena cava filters can be placed in patients who cannot receive concomitant anticoagulation without placing them at significantly higher risk of development of venous thromboembolism.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 324
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Vena cava filters - Do we know all that we need to know? [J].
Ansell, J .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (03) :298-299
[2]   Early duplex scan evaluation of four vena caval interruption devices [J].
Aswad, MA ;
Sandager, GP ;
Pais, SO ;
Malloy, PC ;
Killewich, LA ;
Lilly, MP ;
Flinn, WR .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 24 (05) :809-818
[3]  
BALLEW KA, 1995, CLIN CHEST MED, V16, P295
[4]   INFERIOR VENA-CAVA FILTERS - INDICATIONS, SAFETY, EFFECTIVENESS [J].
BECKER, DM ;
PHILBRICK, JT ;
SELBY, JB .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 152 (10) :1985-1994
[5]   Deep venous thrombosis after percutaneous insertion of vena caval filters [J].
Blebea, J ;
Wilson, R ;
Waybill, P ;
Neumyer, MM ;
Blebea, JS ;
Anderson, KM ;
Atnip, RG .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 30 (05) :821-828
[6]  
CASTELLANI L, 1987, INT ANGIOL, V6, P299
[7]   Evaluation of a new percutaneous stainless steel Greenfield filter [J].
Cho, KJ ;
Greenfield, LJ ;
Proctor, MC ;
Hausmann, LA ;
Bonn, J ;
Dolmatch, BL ;
Eschelman, DJ ;
Flick, PA ;
Kinney, TB ;
Marx, MV ;
McFarland, DR ;
Ohki, SK ;
Pais, SO ;
Sussman, SK ;
Waltman, AC .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 8 (02) :181-187
[8]  
COON WW, 1993, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V270, P1867
[9]   Long-term follow-up of Vena Tech-LGM filter:: Predictors and frequency of caval occlusion [J].
Crochet, DP ;
Brunel, P ;
Trogrlic, S ;
Grossetête, R ;
Auget, JL ;
Dary, C .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (02) :137-142
[10]   VENA TECH-LGM FILTER - LONG-TERM RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
CROCHET, DP ;
STORA, O ;
FERRY, D ;
GROSSETETE, R ;
LEURENT, B ;
BRUNEL, P ;
NGUYEN, JM .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 188 (03) :857-860