Free breathing 2D multi-slice real-time gradient-echo cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: impact on left ventricular function measurements compared with standard multi-breath hold 2D steady-state free precession imaging

被引:6
作者
Sievers, Burkhard [1 ,2 ]
Schrader, Sebastian [2 ]
Hunold, Peter [3 ]
Barkhausen, Joerg [3 ]
Erbel, Raimund [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Duesseldorf, Div Cardiol Pulmonol & Vasc Med, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp, W German Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Essen, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Lubeck, Germany
关键词
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; steady-state free precession imaging (SSFP); fast imaging; real time imaging; ventricular function; automated contour detection; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT; HEART-FAILURE; EJECTION FRACTION; PAPILLARY-MUSCLES; INTERSTUDY REPRODUCIBILITY; DIASTOLIC FUNCTION; VOLUMES; ACQUISITION; IMAGES; MASS;
D O I
10.1080/AC.66.4.2126598
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Multi-breath hold cine-imaging (standard-2D-SSFP) is the standard technique for ventricular function assessment. However, image acquisition is time-consuming and breath holding is required. Ultrafast 2D real-time imaging (2D real time-SSFP) does not require breath holding, but spatial resolution is sacrificed. The accuracy of 2D real time-SSFP free-breathing ventricular function assessment by using an automated contour detection programme has not been systematically studied. Methods and results Twenty-eight subjects (14 with impaired LV function) were investigated by 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Left ventricular short-axis images were acquired with multi-breath hold standard 2D-SSFP and free-breathing 2D real time-SSFP. LV-volumes (EDV, ESV), EF, and mass were determined using a semi-automated contour detection programme. EDV, ESV, EF, and mass were not significantly different between real time- and standard 2D-SSFP in subjects (absolute differences: EDV 3.2 +/- 0.7 mL, ESV 3.0 +/- 0.3 mL, EF 1.9 +/- 0.4 %, mass 0.8 +/- 0.4 g; P >= 0.78) and patients (absolute differences: EDV = 3.0 +/- 0.8 mL, ESV 3.3 +/- 1.0 mL, EF 0.9 +/- 0.5 %, mass 0.9 +/- 0.5 g; P >= 0.73). Automated contour detection required extensive manual correction for real-time imaging (<= 86%). Conclusions Differences in LV function measurements between real-time and standard 2D-SSFP are small, and not significant. Real-time SSFP may be used for rapid LV function assessment when examination time is limited.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 497
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Quantification in cardiac MRI: advances in image acquisition and processing [J].
Attili, Anil K. ;
Schuster, Andreas ;
Nagel, Eike ;
Reiber, Johan H. C. ;
van der Geest, Rob J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2010, 26 :27-40
[2]   Reduction in sample size for studies of remodeling in heart failure by the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance [J].
Bellenger, NG ;
Davies, LC ;
Francis, JM ;
Coats, AJS ;
Pennell, DJ .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2000, 2 (04) :271-278
[3]   Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance - Are they interchangeable? [J].
Bellenger, NG ;
Burgess, MI ;
Ray, SG ;
Lahiri, A ;
Coats, AJS ;
Cleland, JGF ;
Pennell, DJ .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 (16) :1387-1396
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   Signal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arrays [J].
Constantinides, CD ;
Atalar, E ;
McVeigh, ER .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1997, 38 (05) :852-857
[6]   Automated Frame-by-Frame Endocardial Border Detection from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images for Quantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Function: Validation and Clinical Feasibility [J].
Corsi, Cristiana ;
Veronesi, Federico ;
Lamberti, Claudio ;
Bardo, Dianna M. E. ;
Jamison, Ernest B. ;
Lang, Roberto M. ;
Mor-Avi, Victor .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 29 (03) :560-568
[7]   Rapid assessment of left ventricular segmental wall motion, ejection fraction, and volumes with single breath-hold, multi-slice TrueFISP MR imaging [J].
Fieno, David S. ;
Thomson, Louise E. J. ;
Slomka, Piotr J. ;
Abidov, Aiden ;
Nishina, Hidetaka ;
Chien, Daisy ;
Hayes, Sean W. ;
Saouaf, Rola ;
Germano, Guido ;
Friedman, John D. ;
Berman, Daniel S. .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2006, 8 (03) :435-444
[8]   Assessment of left ventricular volumes and mass with fast 3D cine steady-state free precession k-t space broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique (k-t BLAST) [J].
Greil, Gerald F. ;
Germann, Sabrina ;
Kozerke, Sebastian ;
Baltes, Christof ;
Tsao, Jeffrey ;
Urschitz, Michael S. ;
Seeger, Achim ;
Tangcharoen, Tarinee ;
Bialkowsky, Anja ;
Miller, Stephan ;
Sieverding, Ludger .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 27 (03) :510-515
[9]   Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy [J].
Grothues, F ;
Smith, GC ;
Moon, JCC ;
Bellenger, NG ;
Collins, P ;
Klein, HU ;
Pennell, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 90 (01) :29-34
[10]   Interstudy reproducibility of right ventricular volumes, function, and mass with cardiovascular magnetic resonance [J].
Grothues, F ;
Moon, JC ;
Bellenger, NG ;
Smith, GS ;
Klein, HU ;
Pennell, DJ .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 147 (02) :218-223