Challenges and opportunities of group therapy for adolescent substance abuse: A critical review

被引:39
作者
Kaminer, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Dept Psychiat, Alcohol Res Ctr, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
关键词
adolescent; substance abuse; antisocial behavior; group therapy; treatment;
D O I
10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.07.002
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Group intervention has been the most commonly employed treatment modality for adolescents with substance use disorders (SUD). Evidence has been accumulating in support for the efficacy of diverse forms of group therapy that have been utilized with adolescents. It has been argued however, that aggregation of youths who display problem behavior into group interventions may, under some conditions, produce iatrogenic effects on all participants. This assertion known also as "deviancy training" and its presumed effect on treatment outcomes has created a barrier to progress regardless of the fact that it has not been tested or empirically supported in heterogeneous groups of adolescents treated for SUD. It is imperative to optimize group intervention while considering how to prevent, reduce and control, potentially iatrogenic effects associated with the aggregation of antisocial youths in heterogeneous groups. The main objective of this review is to address the challenges and opportunities regarding group treatment of adolescent SUD. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All fights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1765 / 1774
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Ang RP, 2002, SCHOOL PSYCHOL REV, V31, P164
[2]   First do no harm: Adverse effects of grouping deviant youth for skills training [J].
Arnold, ME ;
Hughes, JN .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 37 (01) :99-115
[3]   Evaluation of a group-based substance abuse treatment program for adolescents [J].
Battjes, RJ ;
Gordon, MS ;
O'Grady, KE ;
Kinlock, TW ;
Katz, EC ;
Sears, EA .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2004, 27 (02) :123-134
[4]  
BROWN SA, 2002, TREATING ADOLESCENTS, V26, P890
[5]   Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: A review of the past 10 years, part II [J].
Burke, JD ;
Loeber, R ;
Birmaher, B .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 41 (11) :1275-1293
[6]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[7]   A REVIEW AND REFORMULATION OF SOCIAL INFORMATION-PROCESSING MECHANISMS IN CHILDRENS SOCIAL-ADJUSTMENT [J].
CRICK, NR ;
DODGE, KA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1994, 115 (01) :74-101
[8]   The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: Main findings from two randomized trials [J].
Dennis, M ;
Godley, SH ;
Diamond, G ;
Tims, FM ;
Babor, T ;
Donaldson, J ;
Liddle, H ;
Titus, JC ;
Kaminer, Y ;
Webb, C ;
Hamilton, N ;
Funk, R .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2004, 27 (03) :197-213
[9]  
Dishion T.J., 2000, APPL DEV SCI, V4, P89, DOI DOI 10.1207/S1532480XADS0402_4
[10]   ANTISOCIAL BOYS AND THEIR FRIENDS IN EARLY ADOLESCENCE - RELATIONSHIP CHARACTERISTICS, QUALITY, AND INTERACTIONAL PROCESS [J].
DISHION, TJ ;
ANDREWS, DW ;
CROSBY, L .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1995, 66 (01) :139-151