Smart Farming Technology Trends: Economic and Environmental Effects, Labor Impact, and Adoption Readiness

被引:56
作者
Balafoutis, Athanasios T. [1 ]
Van Evert, Frits K. [2 ]
Fountas, Spyros [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Bioecon & Agrotechnol, Ctr Res & Technol Hellas, Dimarchou Georgiadou 118, Volos 38333, Greece
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Agrosyst Res, POB 16, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Agr Univ Athens, Dept Nat Resources Management & Agr Engn, Athens 11855, Greece
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 05期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
smart farming technologies; recording; reacting; guiding; farm management information system; agricultural robots; automated systems; PRECISION AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGIES; COMPUTER VISION; BIG DATA; SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; FUTURE; SENSORS; ROBOTS; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy10050743
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Farming faces challenges that increase the adverse effects on farms' economics, labor, and the environment. Smart farming technologies (SFTs) are expected to assist in reverting this situation. In this work, 1064 SFTs were derived from scientific papers, research projects, and industrial products. They were classified by technology readiness level (TRL), typology, and field operation, and they were assessed for their economic, environmental, and labor impact, as well as their adoption readiness from end-users. It was shown that scientific articles dealt with SFTs of lower TRL than research projects. In scientific articles, researchers investigated mostly recording technologies, while, in research projects, they focused primarily on farm management information systems and robotic/automation systems. Scouting technologies were the main SFT type in scientific papers and research projects, but variable rate application technologies were mostly located in commercial products. In scientific papers, there was limited analysis of economic, environmental, and labor impact of the SFTs under investigation, while, in research projects, these impacts were studied thoroughly. Further, in commercial SFTs, the focus was on economic impact and less on labor and environmental issues. With respect to adoption readiness, it was found that all of the factors to facilitate SFT adoption became more positive moving from SFTs in scientific papers to fully functional commercial SFTs, indicating that SFTs reach the market when most of these factors are addressed for the benefit of the farmers. This SFT analysis is expected to inform researchers on adapting their research, as well as help policy-makers adjust their strategy toward digitized agriculture adoption and farmers with the current situation and future trends of SFTs.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 114 条
  • [51] Socioeconomic impact of widespread adoption of precision farming and controlled traffic systems in Denmark
    Jensen, Hans Grinsted
    Jacobsen, Lars-Bo
    Pedersen, Soren Marcus
    Tavella, Elena
    [J]. PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2012, 13 (06) : 661 - 677
  • [52] Farm management systems and the Future Internet era
    Kaloxylos, Alexandros
    Eigenmann, Robert
    Teye, Frederick
    Politopoulou, Zoi
    Wolfert, Sjaak
    Shrank, Claudia
    Dillinger, Markus
    Lampropoulou, Ioanna
    Antoniou, Eleni
    Pesonen, Liisa
    Nicole, Huether
    Thomas, Floerchinger
    Alonistioti, Nancy
    Kormentzas, George
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2012, 89 : 130 - 144
  • [53] A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture
    Kamilaris, Andreas
    Kartakoullis, Andreas
    Prenafeta-Boldu, Francesc X.
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2017, 143 : 23 - 37
  • [54] The role of emergence in dynamic capabilities: a restatement of the framework and some possibilities for future research
    Kay, Neil M.
    Leih, Sohvi
    Teece, David J.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2018, 27 (04) : 623 - 638
  • [55] Experience versus expectation: farmers' perceptions of smart farming technologies for cropping systems across Europe
    Kernecker, Maria
    Knierim, Andrea
    Wurbs, Angelika
    Kraus, Teresa
    Borges, Friederike
    [J]. PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2020, 21 (01) : 34 - 50
  • [56] Khan N., 2018, SAE Tech. Paper 2018-01-0031, P1, DOI DOI 10.4271/2018-01-0031
  • [57] THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURE
    King, Anthony
    [J]. NATURE, 2017, 544 (7651) : S21 - S23
  • [58] Emerging technologies for real-time and integrated agriculture decisions
    Kitchen, Newell R.
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2008, 61 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [59] Information technology and farm management: developments and perspectives
    Kuhlmann, F
    Brodersen, C
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2001, 30 (1-3) : 71 - 83
  • [60] Kumar A, 2014, IEEE GLOB HUMANIT C, P333, DOI 10.1109/GHTC.2014.6970301