The role of home country demand in the internationalization of new ventures

被引:22
作者
Murmann, Johann Peter [1 ]
Ozdemir, Salih Zeki [1 ]
Sardana, Deepak [2 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Australia Business Sch, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ S Australia, UniSA Business Sch, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
International new ventures; Internationalization; Small vs. large demand countries; Young biotechnology firms; International partnerships; Business development partnerships; GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION; TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCES; INNOVATION; FIRM; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; PARTNERSHIPS; OPPORTUNITIES; PERFORMANCE; FUTURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.002
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
International new ventures (INVs) have been documented to exist all around the world, but the literature is silent on the frequency of such companies in different countries. We contend that the propensity of new ventures to internationalize by forming international partnerships is higher in small-domestic demand countries because they have a greater motivation given their limited local demand. After discussing the methodological challenges in testing this hypothesis, we do such a test by studying alliances in the health segment of the biotech industry in relatively small-domestic demand countries (Australia, Israel, and Taiwan) and by comparing the results with five large-domestic demand countries (UK, Germany, France, US, and Japan). We find that young firms in the countries with smaller domestic demand are at least 3 times more likely to enter into international partnerships than their counterparts in countries with larger domestic demand. We further demonstrate that this difference can primarily be explained by the difference in the size of domestic healthcare markets rather than other underlying opportunity structure related factors. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1225
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   MODES OF COOPERATIVE R&D COMMERCIALIZATION BY START-UPS [J].
Aggarwal, Vikas A. ;
Hsu, David H. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (08) :835-864
[2]  
Ahuja G, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P317, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317::AID-SMJ90>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-B
[4]   COLLECTIVE INVENTION [J].
ALLEN, RC .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1983, 4 (01) :1-24
[5]   Small-firm strategic research partnerships: The case of biotechnology [J].
Audretsch, DB ;
Feldman, MP .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2003, 15 (02) :273-288
[6]  
Baum JAC, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P267, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-8
[8]  
Beckman CM, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P741, DOI 10.2307/20159796
[9]  
Bell J., 2001, Journal of International management, V7, P173
[10]  
Buckley P. J., 2014, RES POLICY, V4, P70