Logistics tool selection with two-phase fuzzy multi criteria decision making: A case study for personal digital assistant selection

被引:43
作者
Buyukozkan, Gulcin [1 ]
Arsenyan, Jbid [2 ]
Ruan, Da [3 ]
机构
[1] Galatasaray Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34357 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Bahcesehir Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34100 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Belgian Nucl Res Ctr SCK CEN, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
关键词
Fuzzy axiomatic design; Group decision-making; Fuzzy AHP; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Logistics tool selection; Logistics industry; AXIOMATIC DESIGN; MULTIATTRIBUTE SELECTION; MOBILE COMMERCE; TOPSIS; AHP; TECHNOLOGY; MODEL; AGGREGATION; EXTENSION; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.017
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Efficient logistics and supply chain management are enabled through the use of efficient information technologies (IT). The mobile logistics tools represent the IT interface in the supply chain. This paper aims to aid decision makers to identify the most appropriate mobile logistics tools and to achieve this aim, several evaluation criteria are identified to evaluate logistics tools, and a fuzzy axiomatic design (FAD) based group decision-making method is adopted to perform the evaluation in two phases. In the first phase of pre-assessment, alternatives that cannot meet basic requirements and the defined threshold are eliminated. In the second phase of selection, the remaining alternatives are more meticulously evaluated. Criteria weights are determined using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and another fuzzy multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) technique, namely fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), is applied in the second phase to compare the outcome of FAD. A case study is provided in order to demonstrate the potential of the proposed methodology. Personal digital assistants (PDAs) with integrated barcode scanner that are available in the Turkish market are evaluated. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 153
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J FAC ENG ARCHIT GAZ
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
[3]  
Ayag Z, 2007, J INTELL FUZZY SYST, V18, P345
[4]  
Bei W., 2006, SERVICE SYSTEMS SERV, V2, P439
[5]   Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Ruan, Da .
MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2008, 77 (5-6) :464-475
[6]  
Cebi M., 2008, P 8 INT FLINS C COMP
[7]  
Cebi S., 2007, P INT 11 IFAC S COMP, P221
[8]   Indicator design for passenger car using fuzzy axiomatic design principles [J].
Cebi, Selcuk ;
Kahraman, Cengiz .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (09) :6470-6481
[9]   Extension of axiomatic design principles under fuzzy environment [J].
Cebi, Selcuk ;
Kahraman, Cengiz .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (03) :2682-2689
[10]   A hybrid design methodology for structuring an Integrated Environmental Management System (IEMS) for shipping business [J].
Celik, Metin .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (03) :1469-1475