Comment on Cooke's classical method

被引:65
作者
Clemen, Robert T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27708 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.003
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Several of the papers in this special issue are in one way or another linked to Cooke's "classical" method for combining expert probability distributions. This comment focuses on characteristics of that method. In particular, I consider two questions: does the weighting scheme give the experts a positive incentive to report their beliefs honestly for each variable? How does Cooke's method perform when evaluated out-of-sample? (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:760 / 765
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J FORECAST, DOI DOI 10.1016/0169-2070(89)90012-5
[2]  
Clemen RT, 1999, RISK ANAL, V19, P187, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00399.x
[3]  
Cooke R., 1991, EXPERTS UNCERTAINTY
[4]  
DeGroot M. H., 1982, STATISTICAL DECISION, V1, P291
[5]   ALLOCATING THE WEIGHTS IN THE LINEAR OPINION POOL [J].
GENEST, C ;
MCCONWAY, KJ .
JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1990, 9 (01) :53-73
[6]  
Good PI, 2005, RESAMPLING METHODS P
[7]   Probability judgments for continuous quantities: Linear combinations and calibration [J].
Hora, SC .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2004, 50 (05) :597-604
[8]  
Lichtenstein S., 1981, Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980
[9]   The M3-Competition: results, conclusions and implications [J].
Makridakis, S ;
Hibon, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2000, 16 (04) :451-476
[10]   THE M2-COMPETITION - A REAL-TIME JUDGMENTALLY BASED FORECASTING STUDY [J].
MAKRIDAKIS, S ;
CHATFIELD, C ;
HIBON, M ;
LAWRENCE, M ;
MILLS, T ;
ORD, K ;
SIMMONS, LF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1993, 9 (01) :5-22