Single overnight stay after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a bi-center experience

被引:9
作者
Carbonara, Umberto [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jennifer [3 ]
Crocerossa, Fabio [1 ,4 ]
Veccia, Alessandro [1 ]
Hampton, Lance J. [1 ]
Eun, Daniel [3 ]
Autorino, Riccardo [1 ]
机构
[1] VCU Hlth, Div Urol, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
[2] Univ Bari, Dept Urol, Bari, Italy
[3] Temple Univ, Dept Urol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Dept Urol, Catanzaro, Italy
来源
MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY | 2021年 / 73卷 / 06期
关键词
Robotic surgical procedures; Nephrectomy; Length of stay; LENGTH-OF-STAY; RETROPERITONEAL; COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY; TIME;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-6051.20.04054-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Despite hospital length of stay (LOS) being shorter for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) compared to its open counterpart, several series in the literature report on average a LOS of 2-3 days or more. We aimed to assess factors predicting a prolonged length of stay (beyond a single overnight stay) in patients undergoing RAPN. METHODS: Patients who underwent RAPN between 2010 and 2019 at two USA Centers were included and divided into two groups according to LOS: the study group included all patients who were discharged on POD1, whereas the control group included patients with LOS >= 2 days. Demographics, surgical and perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of LOS >= 2. RESULTS: Overall, 173 (60.5%) patients discharged on POD1, and 113 (39.5%) discharged on POD >= 2. Patients in the study group presented a lower mean BMI (29 vs. 32, P=0.02). Retroperitoneal approach was performed in 13.3% patients with shorter LOS (P<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in median OT (144 vs. 168 min, P=0.005) and WIT (19 vs. 23 min, P=0.001). We observed six postoperative complications (3.6%) in patients discharged on POD1 and 35 (30.5%) in control group (P<0.001). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade >= III) were observed in three of POD1 patients (1.8 vs. 6.1%, P<0.001). There was no difference in hospital readmission rate. On logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of prolonged LOS were OT (OR=1.01, 95% CI: 1.0-1.2, P=0.001), and occurrence of a postoperative complication (OR=2.2, 95% CI: 2.0-2.5, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that a single overnight stay after RAPN is feasible and safe. In our experience, and within the limitations of the present analysis, prolonged operative time and occurrence of immediate postoperative complications translate into higher risk of prolonged hospital stay. Besides adopting a minimally invasive approach, surgeons should also implement perioperative care pathways facilitating early discharge without increasing the risk of readmission.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 780
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   A Single Overnight Stay Is Possible for Most Patients Undergoing Robotic Partial Nephrectomy [J].
Abaza, Ronney ;
Shah, Ketul .
UROLOGY, 2013, 81 (02) :301-306
[2]   Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology [J].
Assel, Melissa ;
Sjoberg, Daniel ;
Elders, Andrew ;
Wang, Xuemei ;
Huo, Dezheng ;
Botchway, Albert ;
Delfino, Kristin ;
Fan, Yunhua ;
Zhao, Zhiguo ;
Koyama, Tatsuki ;
Hollenbeck, Brent ;
Qin, Rui ;
Zahnd, Whitney ;
Zabor, Emily C. ;
Kattan, Michael W. ;
Vickers, Andrew J. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (03) :595-604
[3]   Day-case robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: feasibility and preliminary results of a prospective evaluation (UroCCR-25 AMBU-REIN study) [J].
Bernhard, Jean-Christophe ;
Robert, Gregoire ;
Ricard, Solene ;
Michiels, Clement ;
Capon, Gregoire ;
de Hautecloque, Astrid Boulenger ;
Bensadoun, Henri ;
Gay, Josephine ;
Rogier, Julien ;
Tauzin-Fin, Patrick ;
Gross-Goupil, Marine ;
Benard, Antoine ;
Nouette, Karine ;
Roullet, Stephanie ;
Ferriere, Jean-Marie .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (06) :1351-1357
[4]   Impact of Surgical Factors on Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Outcomes: Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Cacciamani, Giovanni E. ;
Medina, Luis G. ;
Gill, Tania ;
Abreu, Andre ;
Sotelo, Rene ;
Artibani, Walter ;
Gill, Inderbir S. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (02) :258-274
[5]   Postoperative Complications After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy [J].
Connor, Jessica ;
Doppalapudi, Sai K. ;
Wajswol, Ethan ;
Ragam, Radhika ;
Press, Benjamin ;
Luu, Thaiphi ;
Koster, Helaine ;
Tamang, Tenzin-Lama ;
Ahmed, Mutahar ;
Lovallo, Gregory ;
Munver, Ravi ;
Stifelman, Michael D. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2020, 34 (01) :42-47
[6]   Variability in Partial Nephrectomy Outcomes: Does Your Surgeon Matter? [J].
Dagenais, Julien ;
Bertolo, Riccardo ;
Garisto, Juan ;
Maurice, Matthew J. ;
Mouracade, Pascal ;
Kara, Onder ;
Chavali, Jaya ;
Li, Jianbo ;
Nelson, Ryan ;
Fergany, Amr ;
Abouassaly, Robert ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (04) :628-634
[7]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[8]   Cost effectiveness and robot-assisted urologic surgery: does it make dollars and sense? [J].
Dobbs, Ryan W. ;
Magnan, Brenden P. ;
Abhyankar, Nikita ;
Hemal, Ashok K. ;
Challacombe, Ben ;
Hu, Jim ;
Dasgupta, Prokar ;
Porpiglia, Francesco ;
Crivellaro, Simone .
MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2017, 69 (04) :313-323
[9]   Episode-based Payment Variation for Urologic Cancer Surgery [J].
Ellimoottil, Chad ;
Li, Jonathan ;
Ye, Zaojun ;
Dupree, James M. ;
Min, Hye Sung ;
Kaye, Deborah ;
Herrel, Lindsey A. ;
Miller, David C. .
UROLOGY, 2018, 111 :78-84
[10]   Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) Classification of Renal Tumours in Patients who are Candidates for Nephron-Sparing Surgery [J].
Ficarra, Vincenzo ;
Novara, Giacomo ;
Secco, Silvia ;
Macchi, Veronica ;
Porzionato, Andrea ;
De Caro, Raffaele ;
Artibani, Walter .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (05) :786-793