Objective assessment of mouth opening after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: A prospective study

被引:4
|
作者
Patel, Kaushal [1 ]
Kalathia, Jaisukh [2 ]
Krishnamoorthy, Venkatesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Sri Sathya Sai Inst Higher Med Sci, Dept Urol & Kidney Transplantat, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] Sri Aurobindo Inst Med Sci, Dept Urol & Kidney Transplantat, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
关键词
Buccal mucosa graft; mouth opening; urethroplasty; ANTERIOR URETHRAL STRICTURES; HARVEST SITE; COMPLICATIONS; NONCLOSURE;
D O I
10.4103/UA.UA_84_19
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objectives: Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) is frequently used for the reconstruction of urethral strictures with acceptable donor-site morbidity after graft harvest. There are only a few prospectively designed studies with a small number of patients reporting oral complications, particularly the mouth opening in the long terms. We did an objective assessment of mouth opening before and after 6 months of BMG urethroplasty as well as pain scores. Materials and Methods: Fifty-eight patients who underwent BMG urethroplasty were included in the study between May 2013 and December 2014. Preoperative mouth opening (reference point between two incisors with the highest of three readings taken as final) was measured using a Vernier caliper. Harvest site was left open to heal by secondary intentions. Postoperatively, mouth opening and pain scores using self-administered (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) assessed on day 1 and day 3, and follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months. Data were analyzed as mean (standard deviation [SD]), proportion, and median (inter-quartile range [IQR]) with two-tailedP < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: The mean age was 39.6 years. The graft was harvested from a single cheek in 50% of patients. In remaining, it was taken from both cheeks, both cheeks with lip, and both cheeks with the tongue in 29.31%, 17.24%, and 3.5%, of patients, respectively. Preoperative mouth opening (5.13 cm [0.08]) was statistically significantly more than mouth opening on day 1 (4.34 cm [0.09]), day 3 (4.48 [0.09]), and day 7 (4.69 cm [0.09]). Mean difference became insignificant at the interval of 1 month (4.91 cm [0.09]) with 6 months' values showing marginal improvement over preoperative values (5.14 cm [0.07]). Pain was tolerable and patients reported low median VAS 2 (2-4) on day 1 and day 3 each. Reported median VAS became 0 (0-0) on day 7. Conclusion: Mouth opening restriction after BMG urethroplasty is a definite entity in the initial postoperative period, which becomes nonsignificant by 6 months. The pain has no effect on mouth opening.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 265
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in female urethral stricture disease: a single-center experience
    Apul Goel
    Sagorika Paul
    Divakar Dalela
    Pushpalata Sankhwar
    Satya Narayan Sankhwar
    Vishwajeet Singh
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2014, 25 : 525 - 530
  • [42] Female anterior wall onlay urethroplasty with lower lip buccal mucosal graft: Importance of the laterally extended incision
    Emami, Maryam
    Shadpour, Pejman
    Kamali, Koosha
    Narimani, Nima
    Hosseini, Jalil
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 10 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [43] Lingual versus buccal mucosal graft for augmentation urethroplasty: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes and patient-reported donor site morbidity
    Wang, Andrew
    Chua, Michael
    Talla, Vishal
    Fernandez, Nicolas
    Ming, Jessica
    Sarino, Esther May
    DeLong, Jessica
    Virasoro, Ramon
    Tonkin, Jeremy
    McCammon, Kurt
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 53 (05) : 907 - 918
  • [44] Multi-Institutional Outcomes of Dorsal Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty in Patients With Postprostatectomy, Postradiation Anastomotic Stenosis
    Sterling, Joshua
    Simhan, Jay
    Flynn, Brian J.
    Rusilko, Paul
    Franca, Wagner A.
    Ramirez, Erick A.
    Angulo, Javier C.
    Martins, Francisco E.
    Patel, Hiren V.
    Higgins, Margaret
    Swerdloff, Daniel
    Nikolavsky, Dmitriy
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (04) : 596 - 604
  • [45] Outcomes of Ventral Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty in Bulbomembranous Urethral Strictures Post-transurethral Resection of the Prostate
    Mousa, Ayman
    Eissa, Ahmed
    Rawal, Amar Y.
    Zoeir, Ahmed
    UROLOGY, 2024, 186 : 9 - 14
  • [46] Circular Penile Skin Fasciocutaneous Ventral Onlay Flap Urethroplasty as an Alternative to Dorsal Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty in Complex Long-Segment Urethral Stricture: A Retrospective Study
    Singh, Rana P.
    Jamal, Arshad
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [47] Dorsal Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty for Long Segment Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Retrospective Study of Mid and Long-term Outcomes
    Manjunath, V
    Jain, Deep Kumar
    Shwethashree, M.
    Choudhary, Anupam
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (04) : OC5 - OC7
  • [48] Buccal Versus Lingual Mucosa Graft in Anterior Urethroplasty: A Prospective Comparison of Surgical Outcome and Donor Site Morbidity
    Lumen, N.
    Vierstraete-Verlinde, S.
    Oosterlinck, W.
    Hoebeke, P.
    Palminteri, E.
    Goes, C.
    Maes, H.
    Spinoit, A. -F.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (01) : 112 - 117
  • [49] The Staged Urethroplasty with Vascularised Scrotal Flap and Buccal Mucosa Graft after Failed Hypospadias Surgery: A Reliable Technique with a Novel Tool
    Pandey, Abhishek
    Barta-Kelemen, Anna-Maria
    Borisenkov, Michael F.
    Keller, Hansjoerg
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2017, 99 (01) : 36 - 42
  • [50] Dorsal buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty by a ventral sagittal urethrotomy and minimal-access perineal approach for anterior urethral stricture
    Gupta, NP
    Ansari, MS
    Dogra, PN
    Tandon, S
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 93 (09) : 1287 - 1290