Objective assessment of mouth opening after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: A prospective study

被引:4
|
作者
Patel, Kaushal [1 ]
Kalathia, Jaisukh [2 ]
Krishnamoorthy, Venkatesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Sri Sathya Sai Inst Higher Med Sci, Dept Urol & Kidney Transplantat, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] Sri Aurobindo Inst Med Sci, Dept Urol & Kidney Transplantat, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
关键词
Buccal mucosa graft; mouth opening; urethroplasty; ANTERIOR URETHRAL STRICTURES; HARVEST SITE; COMPLICATIONS; NONCLOSURE;
D O I
10.4103/UA.UA_84_19
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objectives: Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) is frequently used for the reconstruction of urethral strictures with acceptable donor-site morbidity after graft harvest. There are only a few prospectively designed studies with a small number of patients reporting oral complications, particularly the mouth opening in the long terms. We did an objective assessment of mouth opening before and after 6 months of BMG urethroplasty as well as pain scores. Materials and Methods: Fifty-eight patients who underwent BMG urethroplasty were included in the study between May 2013 and December 2014. Preoperative mouth opening (reference point between two incisors with the highest of three readings taken as final) was measured using a Vernier caliper. Harvest site was left open to heal by secondary intentions. Postoperatively, mouth opening and pain scores using self-administered (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) assessed on day 1 and day 3, and follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months. Data were analyzed as mean (standard deviation [SD]), proportion, and median (inter-quartile range [IQR]) with two-tailedP < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: The mean age was 39.6 years. The graft was harvested from a single cheek in 50% of patients. In remaining, it was taken from both cheeks, both cheeks with lip, and both cheeks with the tongue in 29.31%, 17.24%, and 3.5%, of patients, respectively. Preoperative mouth opening (5.13 cm [0.08]) was statistically significantly more than mouth opening on day 1 (4.34 cm [0.09]), day 3 (4.48 [0.09]), and day 7 (4.69 cm [0.09]). Mean difference became insignificant at the interval of 1 month (4.91 cm [0.09]) with 6 months' values showing marginal improvement over preoperative values (5.14 cm [0.07]). Pain was tolerable and patients reported low median VAS 2 (2-4) on day 1 and day 3 each. Reported median VAS became 0 (0-0) on day 7. Conclusion: Mouth opening restriction after BMG urethroplasty is a definite entity in the initial postoperative period, which becomes nonsignificant by 6 months. The pain has no effect on mouth opening.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 265
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Liquid buccal mucosa graft endoscopic urethroplasty: a validation animal study
    Kathryn A. Scott
    Guanqun Li
    Jared Manwaring
    Daniela A. Nikolavsky
    Yelena Fudym
    Tiffany Caza
    Zain Badar
    Nicole Taylor
    Gennady Bratslavsky
    Leszek Kotula
    Dmitriy Nikolavsky
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 2139 - 2145
  • [32] Development and content validation of the Urethroplasty Training and Assessment Tool (UTAT) for dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty
    Jasionowska, Sara
    Shabbir, Majed
    Brunckhorst, Oliver
    Khan, Muhammad Shamim
    Manzoor, Hussain
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Anderson, Paul
    Barbagli, Guido
    Ahmed, Kamran
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 125 (05) : 725 - 731
  • [33] Outcomes of Ventral Onlay Buccal Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty in Patients after Radiotherapy
    Ahyai, Sascha A.
    Schmid, Marianne
    Kuhl, Marie
    Kluth, Luis A.
    Soave, Armin
    Riechardt, Silke
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Engel, Oliver
    Fisch, Margit
    Dahlem, Roland
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (02) : 441 - 446
  • [34] Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture, experience from a low-income country
    Awad, Sami Mahjoub Taha
    Ahmed, Musab Abdalla M.
    Abdalla, Yassin Mohamed Osman
    Ahmed, Mohammed El Imam M.
    Gismalla, Mohamed Daffalla-Awadalla
    BMC UROLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [35] Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture, experience from a low-income country
    Sami Mahjoub Taha Awad
    Musab Abdalla M. Ahmed
    Yassin Mohamed Osman Abdalla
    Mohammed El Imam M. Ahmed
    Mohamed Daffalla-Awadalla Gismalla
    BMC Urology, 21
  • [36] Decision regret and long-term success rates after ventral buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty
    Santiago, Javier E.
    Gross, Michael D.
    Accioly, Joao Pedro
    Voelzke, Bryan B.
    Breyer, Benjamin N.
    Khouri, Roger K.
    DeWitt-Foy, Molly E.
    Angermeier, Kenneth W.
    Wood, Hadley M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 135 (02) : 303 - 309
  • [37] Lingual versus buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture: A prospective comparative analysis
    Sharma, Adittya K.
    Chandrashekar, Ratkal
    Keshavamurthy, Ramaiah
    Nelvigi, Girish G.
    Kamath, Ananth J.
    Sharma, Satyam
    Venkatesh, G. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 20 (12) : 1199 - 1203
  • [38] To Transect or Not Transect: Results from the Scandinavian Urethroplasty Study, A Multicentre Randomised Study of Bulbar Urethroplasty Comparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis Versus Buccal Mucosal Grafting
    Nilsen, Ole Jacob
    Holm, Henriette Veiby
    Ekerhult, Teresa O.
    Lindqvist, Klas
    Grabowska, Beata
    Persson, Beata
    Sairanen, Jukka
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 (04) : 375 - 382
  • [39] Dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in female urethral stricture disease: a single-center experience
    Goel, Apul
    Paul, Sagorika
    Dalela, Divakar
    Sankhwar, Pushpalata
    Sankhwar, Satya Narayan
    Singh, Vishwajeet
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2014, 25 (04) : 525 - 530
  • [40] Dorsal Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty in the Treatment of Urethral Strictures - Does the Stricture Length Affect Success?
    Yalcinkaya, Fatih
    Zengin, Kursad
    Sertcelik, Nurettin
    Yigitbasi, Orhan
    Bozkurt, Halil
    Sarikaya, Tevfik
    Karabacak, Raif
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 24 (02): : 297 - 300