Objective assessment of mouth opening after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: A prospective study

被引:4
|
作者
Patel, Kaushal [1 ]
Kalathia, Jaisukh [2 ]
Krishnamoorthy, Venkatesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Sri Sathya Sai Inst Higher Med Sci, Dept Urol & Kidney Transplantat, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] Sri Aurobindo Inst Med Sci, Dept Urol & Kidney Transplantat, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
关键词
Buccal mucosa graft; mouth opening; urethroplasty; ANTERIOR URETHRAL STRICTURES; HARVEST SITE; COMPLICATIONS; NONCLOSURE;
D O I
10.4103/UA.UA_84_19
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objectives: Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) is frequently used for the reconstruction of urethral strictures with acceptable donor-site morbidity after graft harvest. There are only a few prospectively designed studies with a small number of patients reporting oral complications, particularly the mouth opening in the long terms. We did an objective assessment of mouth opening before and after 6 months of BMG urethroplasty as well as pain scores. Materials and Methods: Fifty-eight patients who underwent BMG urethroplasty were included in the study between May 2013 and December 2014. Preoperative mouth opening (reference point between two incisors with the highest of three readings taken as final) was measured using a Vernier caliper. Harvest site was left open to heal by secondary intentions. Postoperatively, mouth opening and pain scores using self-administered (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) assessed on day 1 and day 3, and follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months. Data were analyzed as mean (standard deviation [SD]), proportion, and median (inter-quartile range [IQR]) with two-tailedP < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: The mean age was 39.6 years. The graft was harvested from a single cheek in 50% of patients. In remaining, it was taken from both cheeks, both cheeks with lip, and both cheeks with the tongue in 29.31%, 17.24%, and 3.5%, of patients, respectively. Preoperative mouth opening (5.13 cm [0.08]) was statistically significantly more than mouth opening on day 1 (4.34 cm [0.09]), day 3 (4.48 [0.09]), and day 7 (4.69 cm [0.09]). Mean difference became insignificant at the interval of 1 month (4.91 cm [0.09]) with 6 months' values showing marginal improvement over preoperative values (5.14 cm [0.07]). Pain was tolerable and patients reported low median VAS 2 (2-4) on day 1 and day 3 each. Reported median VAS became 0 (0-0) on day 7. Conclusion: Mouth opening restriction after BMG urethroplasty is a definite entity in the initial postoperative period, which becomes nonsignificant by 6 months. The pain has no effect on mouth opening.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 265
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Oral quality of life after buccal mucosal graft harvest for substitution urethroplasty. More than a bite?
    Moran, E.
    Bonillo, M. A.
    Fernandez-Estevan, L.
    Martinez-Cuenca, E.
    Arlandis, S.
    Broseta, E.
    Boronat, F.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (02) : 385 - 389
  • [22] Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty for Penile Stricture: Only Dorsal or Combined Dorsal and Ventral Graft Placement?
    Goel, Apul
    Goel, Anuj
    Jain, Abhishek
    UROLOGY, 2011, 77 (06) : 1482 - 1486
  • [23] Dorsolateral onlay buccal mucosal urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures by unilateral urethral mobilization: A prospective study
    Murugan, P. Puvai
    Iyyan, A. Bhalaguru
    Selvathangam, Akash
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 31 (05) : 206 - 210
  • [24] The outcomes of three buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty techniques in women with urethral stricture disease
    Gulpinar, Omer
    Zumrutbas, Ali Ersin
    Sanci, Adem
    Butun, Salih
    Gokce, Mehmet Ilker
    Aybek, Zafer
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2021, 40 (08) : 1921 - 1928
  • [25] Single stage ventral onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for navicular fossa strictures
    Chowdhury, Puskar Shyam
    Nayak, Prasant
    Mallick, Sujata
    Gurumurthy, Srinivasan
    David, Deepak
    Mossadeq, A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 30 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [26] The Success of Dorsal Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty in Challenging Urethral Stricture Cases After Multiple Failed Urethrotomies
    Ozturk, S. A.
    Guzel, A.
    Ergun, O.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 25 (06) : 794 - 800
  • [27] Dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosa graft versus penile skin flap for management of long anterior urethral strictures: a prospective randomized study
    Soliman, Mohamed G.
    Abo Farha, Mohamed
    El Abd, Ahmed S.
    Hameed, Hussein Abdel
    El Gamal, Samir
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 48 (05) : 466 - 473
  • [28] Oral complications after lingual mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty
    Kumar, Abhay
    Goyal, Neeraj K.
    Das, Suren K.
    Trivedi, Sameer
    Dwivedi, Udai S.
    Singh, Pratap B.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 77 (11) : 970 - 973
  • [29] USE OF A DIGESTIVE MUCOSAL GRAFT IN URETHROPLASTY - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY - PROSPECTIVE UTILIZATION OF THE APPENDIX MUCOSA
    LEBRET, T
    GOBET, F
    DALLASERRA, M
    MITROFANOFF, P
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1995, 27 (01) : 58 - 61
  • [30] Optimizing decision-making after ventral onlay buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty failure
    Bandini, Marco
    Basile, Giuseppe
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Valli, Benedetta
    Balo, Sofia
    Barbagli, Guido
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 131 (03) : 339 - 347