Objective assessment of mouth opening after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: A prospective study

被引:4
|
作者
Patel, Kaushal [1 ]
Kalathia, Jaisukh [2 ]
Krishnamoorthy, Venkatesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Sri Sathya Sai Inst Higher Med Sci, Dept Urol & Kidney Transplantat, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] Sri Aurobindo Inst Med Sci, Dept Urol & Kidney Transplantat, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
关键词
Buccal mucosa graft; mouth opening; urethroplasty; ANTERIOR URETHRAL STRICTURES; HARVEST SITE; COMPLICATIONS; NONCLOSURE;
D O I
10.4103/UA.UA_84_19
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objectives: Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) is frequently used for the reconstruction of urethral strictures with acceptable donor-site morbidity after graft harvest. There are only a few prospectively designed studies with a small number of patients reporting oral complications, particularly the mouth opening in the long terms. We did an objective assessment of mouth opening before and after 6 months of BMG urethroplasty as well as pain scores. Materials and Methods: Fifty-eight patients who underwent BMG urethroplasty were included in the study between May 2013 and December 2014. Preoperative mouth opening (reference point between two incisors with the highest of three readings taken as final) was measured using a Vernier caliper. Harvest site was left open to heal by secondary intentions. Postoperatively, mouth opening and pain scores using self-administered (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) assessed on day 1 and day 3, and follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months. Data were analyzed as mean (standard deviation [SD]), proportion, and median (inter-quartile range [IQR]) with two-tailedP < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: The mean age was 39.6 years. The graft was harvested from a single cheek in 50% of patients. In remaining, it was taken from both cheeks, both cheeks with lip, and both cheeks with the tongue in 29.31%, 17.24%, and 3.5%, of patients, respectively. Preoperative mouth opening (5.13 cm [0.08]) was statistically significantly more than mouth opening on day 1 (4.34 cm [0.09]), day 3 (4.48 [0.09]), and day 7 (4.69 cm [0.09]). Mean difference became insignificant at the interval of 1 month (4.91 cm [0.09]) with 6 months' values showing marginal improvement over preoperative values (5.14 cm [0.07]). Pain was tolerable and patients reported low median VAS 2 (2-4) on day 1 and day 3 each. Reported median VAS became 0 (0-0) on day 7. Conclusion: Mouth opening restriction after BMG urethroplasty is a definite entity in the initial postoperative period, which becomes nonsignificant by 6 months. The pain has no effect on mouth opening.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 265
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outpatient buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty outcomes are comparable to inpatient procedures
    McKibben, Maxim J.
    Davenport, Michael T.
    Mukherjee, Partho
    Shakir, Nabeel A.
    West, Mary L.
    Fuchs, Joceline S.
    Ward, Ellen E.
    Bergeson, Rachel L.
    Scott, Jeremy M.
    Morey, Allen F.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [2] Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty
    Dublin, N
    Stewart, LH
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 94 (06) : 867 - 869
  • [3] Patient-reported outcomes after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for bulbar urethral strictures: results of a prospective single-centre cohort study
    D'hulst, Pieter
    Muilwijk, Tim
    Vander Eeckt, Kathy
    van der Aa, Frank
    Joniau, Steven
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (06) : 684 - 693
  • [4] Evaluation of the Extent of Primary Buccal Mucosal Graft Contracture in Augmentation Urethroplasty for Stricture Urethra: A Prospective Observational Study at a Tertiary Healthcare Centre
    BhalaguruIyyan, A.
    Murugan, P. Puvai
    Alakhananda, Chandranaath C.
    Hameed, B. M. Zeeshan
    ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2021, 2021
  • [5] Factors Predicting Urethral Stricture Recurrence after Dorsal Onlay Augmented, Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty
    Shalkamy, Osama
    Abdelazim, Hassan
    Elshazly, Ahmed
    Soliman, Ahmed
    Agha, Mohammed
    Tagreda, Ibrahim
    Hindawy, Mohammed
    Kotb, Ayman
    Farid, Mamdouh
    Ahmed, Abul-fotouh
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2021, 105 (3-4) : 269 - 277
  • [6] Augmented Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Ventrally Placed Buccal Mucosal Graft
    Nerli, R. B.
    Deole, Sushant
    Devraju, Shishir
    Ghagane, Shridhar C.
    Hiremath, Murigendra B.
    Dixit, Neeraj S.
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY, 2020, 47 (01) : 37 - 40
  • [7] Oral Submucous Fibrosis Secondary to Buccal Mucosal Graft for Urethroplasty
    Hafiz Md Ansari
    Santhosh Rao
    Amit Sharma
    Virat Galhotra
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2022, 74 : 5601 - 5603
  • [8] Oral Submucous Fibrosis Secondary to Buccal Mucosal Graft for Urethroplasty
    Ansari, Hafiz Md
    Rao, Santhosh
    Sharma, Amit
    Galhotra, Virat
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2022, 74 (SUPPL 3) : 5601 - 5603
  • [9] Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in men-risk factors for recurrence and complications: a third referral centre experience in anterior urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft
    Spilotros, Marco
    Sihra, Neha
    Malde, Sachin
    Pakzad, Mahreen H.
    Hamid, Rizwan
    Ockrim, Jeremy L.
    Greenwell, Tamsin J.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 510 - 516
  • [10] Risk factors associated with urethral stricture recurrence after end-to-end urethroplasty and buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty
    Pallares-Mendez, Rigoberto
    Cota-Aguero, Jesus Arturo
    Gutierrez-Gonzalez, Adrian
    Cervantes-Miranda, Daniel Eduardo
    Hernandez-Aranda, Katherine Lyn
    Ochoa-Arvizo, Mario
    Aguilar-Rivera, Luis Gerardo
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2022, 89 (02) : 268 - 273