Improved Detection Rate of Ovarian Cancer Using a 2-Step Triage Model of the Risk of Malignancy Index and Expert Sonography in an Outpatient Screening Setting

被引:12
作者
Manegold-Brauer, Gwendolin [1 ]
Buechel, Johanna [1 ]
Knipprath-Meszaros, Alexandra [1 ]
Schoetzau, Andreas [2 ]
Hacker, Neville F. [3 ]
Tercanli, Sevgi
Lapaire, Olav [1 ]
Heinzelmann-Schwarz, Viola [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Hosp Women, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Dept Biomed, Ovarian Canc Res, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ New South Wales, Royal Hosp Women, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Gynecol Canc Ctr, Randwick, NSW, Australia
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Adnexal mass; CA125; Ultrasound; Pattern recognition; MENOPAUSAL STATUS; PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS; COLLABORATIVE TRIAL; PELVIC MASSES; TUMOR-MARKERS; SERUM CA125; BENIGN; ULTRASOUND; DISCRIMINATION; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1097/IGC.0000000000000718
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Preoperative assessment of adnexal masses with ultrasound has been shown to be time-, cost-effective, and specific. When used in combination with the menopausal status and the tumor marker CA125, the risk of malignancy index (RMI) can be calculated, allowing appropriate preoperative triage of patients to a gynecologist or a gynecological oncologist. Moreover, it allows for accurate planning of the required surgical procedure (laparoscopy vs laparotomy). Methods: A large general gynecologic ultrasonic database retrospectively identified 5218 patients for a 14-year period who presented to the outpatient clinic with an adnexal mass. Additional data (menopausal status, histology, CA125 values) were available in 1108 of these patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. The results were then compared with previously published data from a large Australian gynecological cancer center (GCC, n = 204). Results: With the use of an RMI cutoff of 200, malignant ovarian tumors were correctly triaged to a gynecologic oncologist in 123 of 172 cases, leading to a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 92% in our general outpatient clinic population compared with a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 77% in the GCC high-risk population. The negative predictive value was 95% compared with only 85% in the GCC cohort. We hypothesize that improvement of the overall detection rate of malignancy could be improved from 72% to 85% using a 2-step model, referring patients with an ultrasonic score of 3 to an experienced sonographer who uses pattern recognition. Conclusions: The RMI is an easy and reliable tool for the accurate triage of adnexal masses. Its value is higher in an unselected gynecological outpatient setting. Our proposed 2-step model including expert pattern recognition could influence particularly the detection rate in borderline and early-stage ovarian cancers and overcome the limitations of the tumor marker CA125.
引用
收藏
页码:1062 / 1069
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Bailey J, INT J GYNECOL CAN S1, V16, P30
[2]  
Berjapibal Mongkol, 2007, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V90, P1986
[3]   The importance of individual biology in the clinical use of serum biomarkers for ovarian cancer [J].
Braga, Federica ;
Ferraro, Simona ;
Mozzi, Roberta ;
Panteghini, Mauro .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 52 (11) :1625-1631
[4]   Effect of Screening on Ovarian Cancer Mortality The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Buys, Saundra S. ;
Partridge, Edward ;
Black, Amanda ;
Johnson, Christine C. ;
Lamerato, Lois ;
Isaacs, Claudine ;
Reding, Douglas J. ;
Greenlee, Robert T. ;
Yokochi, Lance A. ;
Kessel, Bruce ;
Crawford, E. David ;
Church, Timothy R. ;
Andriole, Gerald L. ;
Weissfeld, Joel L. ;
Fouad, Mona N. ;
Chia, David ;
O'Brien, Barbara ;
Ragard, Lawrence R. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Rathmell, Joshua M. ;
Riley, Thomas L. ;
Hartge, Patricia ;
Pinsky, Paul F. ;
Zhu, Claire S. ;
Izmirlian, Grant ;
Kramer, Barnett S. ;
Miller, Anthony B. ;
Xu, Jian-Lun ;
Prorok, Philip C. ;
Gohagan, John K. ;
Berg, Christine D. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 305 (22) :2295-2303
[5]   Ovarian cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: Findings from the initial screen of a randomized trial [J].
Buys, SS ;
Partridge, E ;
Greene, MH ;
Prorok, PC ;
Reding, D ;
Riley, TL ;
Hartge, P ;
Fagerstrom, RM ;
Chia, D ;
Izmirlian, G ;
Fouad, M ;
Ragard, LR ;
Johnson, CC ;
Gohagan, JK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (05) :1630-1639
[6]   A population-based study of patterns of care for ovarian cancer: Who is seen by a gynecologic oncologist and who is not? [J].
Carney, ME ;
Lancaster, JM ;
Ford, C ;
Tsodikov, A ;
Wiggins, CL .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2002, 84 (01) :36-42
[7]   Triage of ovarian masses [J].
Chia, Yin Nin ;
Marsden, Donald E. ;
Robertson, Greg ;
Hacker, Neville F. .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 48 (03) :322-328
[8]   Risk of Malignancy Index in the Evaluation of Patients With Adnexal Masses [J].
Clarke, Sharon E. ;
Grimshaw, Robert ;
Rittenberg, Paula ;
Kieser, Katharina ;
Bentley, James .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2009, 31 (05) :440-445
[9]   THE ADNEXAL MASS - BENIGN OR MALIGNANT - EVALUATION OF A RISK OF MALIGNANCY INDEX [J].
DAVIES, AP ;
JACOBS, I ;
WOOLAS, R ;
FISH, A ;
ORAM, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (10) :927-931
[10]   Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients [J].
Earle, CC ;
Schrag, D ;
Neville, BA ;
Yabroff, KR ;
Topor, M ;
Fahey, A ;
Trimble, EL ;
Bodurka, DC ;
Bristow, RE ;
Carney, M ;
Warren, JL .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (03) :172-180