Spine device clinical trials: design and sponsorship

被引:21
作者
Cher, Daniel J. [1 ]
Capobianco, Robyn A. [1 ]
机构
[1] SI BONE Inc, Dept Clin Affairs, San Jose, CA 95128 USA
关键词
Spine surgery; Medical devices; Implants; Industry sponsorship; Bias; Multicenter clinical trials; FUNDING SOURCE; OF-INTEREST; ASSOCIATION; OUTCOMES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.027
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Multicenter prospective randomized clinical trials represent the best evidence to support the safety and effectiveness of medical devices. Industry sponsorship of multicenter clinical trials is purported to lead to bias. PURPOSE: To determine what proportion of spine device-related trials are industry-sponsored and the effect of industry sponsorship on trial design. STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of data from a publicly available clinical trials database. METHODS: Clinical trials of spine devices registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, a publicly accessible trial database, were evaluated in terms of design, number and location of study centers, and sample size. The relationship between trial design characteristics and study sponsorship was evaluated using logistic regression and general linear models. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred thrity-eight studies were retrieved from ClinicalTrials.gov using the search term "spine." Of the 367 trials that focused on spine surgery, 200 (54.5%) specifically studied devices for spine surgery and 167 (45.5%) focused on other issues related to spine surgery. Compared with nondevice trials, device trials were far more likely to be sponsored by the industry (74% vs. 22.2%, odds ratio (OR) 9.9 [95% confidence interval 6.1-16.3]). Industry-sponsored device trials were more likely multicenter (80% vs. 29%, OR 9.8 [4.8-21.1]) and had approximately four times as many participating study centers (p<.0001) and larger sample sizes. There were very few US-based multicenter randomized trials of spine devices not sponsored by the industry. CONCLUSIONS: Most device-related spine research is industry-sponsored. Multicenter trials are more likely to be industry-sponsored. These findings suggest that previously published studies showing larger effect sizes in industry-sponsored vs. nonindustry-sponsored studies may be biased as a result of failure to take into account the marked differences in design and purpose. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1140
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Bhandari M, 2004, CAN MED ASSOC J, V170, P477
[2]   Association of industry sponsorship to published outcomes in gastrointestinal clinical research [J].
Brown, Alphonso ;
Kraft, Daniel ;
Schmitz, Sara M. ;
Sharpless, Virginia ;
Martin, Christopher ;
Shah, Ritesh ;
Shaheen, Nicholas J. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 4 (12) :1445-1451
[3]   Funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: are they related? Results of a pilot study [J].
Clifford, TJ ;
Barrowman, NJ ;
Moher, D .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2002, 2 (1) :18
[4]  
Gail MH., 2005, Encyclopedia of Biostatistics
[5]   Association between funding source and study outcome in orthopaedic research [J].
Leopold, SS ;
Warme, WJ ;
Braunlich, EF ;
Shott, S .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (415) :293-301
[6]  
Lundh A, 2012, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub3, 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub2]
[7]   Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; Good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not [J].
Lynch, Joseph R. ;
Cunningham, Mary R. A. ;
Warme, Winston J. ;
Schaad, Douglas C. ;
Wolf, Fredric M. ;
Leopold, Seth S. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (05) :1010-1018
[8]   Is research presented at the Scoliosis Research Society annual meeting influenced by industry funding? [J].
Roach, James W. ;
Skaggs, David L. ;
Sponseller, Paul D. ;
MacLeod, Lynne M. .
SPINE, 2008, 33 (20) :2208-2212
[9]   Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in spine [J].
Shah, RV ;
Albert, TJ ;
Bruegel-Sanchez, V ;
Vaccaro, AR ;
Hilibrand, AS ;
Grauer, JN .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (09) :1099-1104
[10]   Financial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: evidence from a qualitative study [J].
Snowdon, Claire ;
Elbourne, Diana R. ;
Garcia, Jo ;
Campbell, Marion K. ;
Entwistle, Vikki A. ;
Francis, David ;
Grant, Adrian M. ;
Knight, Rosemary C. ;
McDonald, Alison M. ;
Roberts, Ian .
TRIALS, 2006, 7 (1)