Society of Family Planning Guidelines: Postplacental insertion of intrauterine devices

被引:38
作者
Whitaker, Amy K. [1 ]
Chen, Beatrice A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 5842 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Postpartum contraception; Intrauterine device; Intrauterine system; Contraception; Levonorgestrel; Postplacental IUD; Postpartum IUD; IUD expulsion; RAPID REPEAT PREGNANCY; ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION; IMMEDIATE POSTPARTUM; IUD INSERTION; CESAREAN DELIVERY; DELAYED INSERTION; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; EXPULSION RATE; RISK-FACTORS; ULTRASOUND;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Postplacental intrauterine device (IUD) placement, defined as IUD placement within 10 min after delivery of the placenta, is an appealing strategy for increasing access to postpartum IUDs because it does not require a separate postpartum visit. These guidelines present an evidence-based assessment of postplacental IUD placement after vaginal and cesarean delivery. Postplacental IUD insertion is safe and does not have higher risks of complications than interval insertion. Most studies find that the risk of IUD expulsion is higher after postplacental insertion than after interval insertion for both vaginal and cesarean deliveries. Most studies find higher rates of expulsion after vaginal delivery than after cesarean delivery. However, expulsion rates vary widely across studies, without clear evidence about the factors that may influence expulsion. In settings where replacement of expelled IUDs is available, patient populations with low rates of return for the postpartum visit are most likely to benefit from provision of postplacental IUD placement with appropriate counseling about risks and benefits. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 13
页数:12
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] Visibility of Strings After Postplacental Intracesarean Insertion of CuT380A and Cu375 Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Randomized Comparative Study
    Agarwal K.
    Dewan R.
    Mittal P.
    Aggarwal A.
    [J]. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2017, 67 (5) : 324 - 329
  • [2] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice, 2016, Obstet Gynecol, V128, pe32, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001587
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V114, P1434, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c6f965
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1983, WHO Offset Publ, P1
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1980, Contraception, V22, P9
  • [6] [Anonymous], J FAM PLANN REPROD H
  • [7] [Anonymous], EINSTEIN
  • [8] [Anonymous], MED REIMB POSTP LARC
  • [9] [Anonymous], GINECOL OBSTET MEX
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2012, GUID PER CAR