Mechanisms before Reactions: A Mechanistic Approach to the Organic Chemistry Curriculum Based on Patterns of Electron Flow

被引:102
作者
Flynn, Alison B. [1 ]
Ogilvie, William W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Dept Chem, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
关键词
First-Year Undergraduate/General; Second-Year Undergraduate; Curriculum; Organic Chemistry; Problem Solving/Decision Making; Constructivism; Mechanisms of Reactions; Lewis Structures; PUSHING FORMALISM; STUDENT;
D O I
10.1021/ed500284d
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
A significant redesign of the introductory organic chemistry curriculum at the authors' institution is described. There are two aspects that differ greatly from a typical. functional group approach. First, organic reaction mechanisms and the electron-pushing formalism are taught before students have learned a single reaction. The conservation of electrons, atoms, and formal charges, how. the use of curved arrows helps describe the mechanism, and how to predict reaction mechanisms are emphasized. Second, the reactions taught in the first two semesters of organic chemistry are arranged by their governing mechanism, rather than by functional group. The reactions are taught in order of increasing difficulty, beginning with acid-base reactions, followed by simple additions to pi electrophiles, and ending the first semester with addition to pi nudeophiles, including aromatic chemistry. The reactions in the second organic semester begin with elimination reactions, then substitutions, and finally more complex pi nudeophile mechanisms (e.g., aldol reaction) and pi electrophile reactions (e.g., acetals). Ultimately, the goal is for students to learn and interpret reactions based on their patterns of reactivity, allowing them to analyze, predict, and explain new reactions. In principle, a mechanistic method is more general, easier to understand, and provides a better way to achieve a deep understanding of chemical reactivity. Chemical reactions follow patterns, and these patterns can allow a chemist to predict how a chemical will behave, even if they have never seen a particular reaction before. Visualizing reactivity as a collection of patterns in electron movement is a more powerful and systematic way to approach learning in organic chemistry. It still requires some memorization, but because the course organization is directly linked to reaction patterns, deeper learning in the discipline is possible.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 810
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Anderson J. P., 2009, THESIS PURDUE U W LA
[2]   What can we do about 'Parker'? A case study of a good student who didn't 'get' organic chemistry [J].
Anderson, Trisha L. ;
Bodner, George M. .
CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2008, 9 (02) :93-101
[3]   It gets me to the product: How students propose organic mechanisms [J].
Bhattacharyya, G ;
Bodner, GM .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 82 (09) :1402-1407
[4]   Trials and tribulations: student approaches and difficulties with proposing mechanisms using the electron-pushing formalism [J].
Bhattacharyya, Gautam .
CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2014, 15 (04) :594-609
[5]   From Source to Sink: Mechanistic Reasoning Using the Electron-Pushing Formalism [J].
Bhattacharyya, Gautam .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 90 (10) :1282-1289
[6]   uRespond: iPad as Interactive, Personal Response System [J].
Bryfczynski, Samuel P. ;
Brown, Rebecca ;
Hester, Josiah ;
Herrmann, Andrew ;
Koch, Danielle L. ;
Cooper, Melanie M. ;
Grove, Nathaniel P. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 91 (03) :357-363
[7]  
Clayden Greeves., 2012, Organic Chemistry
[8]   Lost in Lewis Structures: An Investigation of Student Difficulties in Developing Representational Competence [J].
Cooper, Melanie M. ;
Grove, Nathaniel ;
Underwood, Sonia M. ;
Klymkowsky, Michael W. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 87 (08) :869-874
[9]  
Duffy-Matzner J. L., 2012, ADV TEACHING ORGANIC, V1108
[10]   Making sense of the arrow-pushing formalism among chemistry majors enrolled in organic chemistry [J].
Ferguson, Robert ;
Bodner, George M. .
CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2008, 9 (02) :102-113