Evaluating the Water Holding Capacity of Multilayer Soil Profiles Using Hydrus-1D and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

被引:12
作者
Wang, Xin [1 ]
Zhao, Yanling [1 ]
Liu, Huifang [2 ]
Xiao, Wu [3 ]
Chen, Shuzhao [4 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, Inst Land Reclamat & Ecol Restorat, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] China ENFI Engn Co Ltd, Beijing 100036, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Land Management, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[4] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Mines, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China
关键词
multilayer soil profile; capillary barrier; hydraulic barrier; Hydrus-1D; CAPILLARY BARRIER; INFILTRATION; TRANSPORT; DYNAMICS; TEXTURE; CHINA; MODEL; SWAP; FLOW;
D O I
10.3390/w12030773
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In semi-arid climate regions of China, vegetation restoration on open pit mining lands is limited by soil moisture. However, multi-layered soil profiles can impede water infiltration into deeper underground, leaving more water stored in the root zone. Here, three types of soils with contrasting texture, sandy loam (SL), sand (S), and silt loam (SiL), were used to construct four multilayer profiles: SL-SiL, SL-S, SL-S-SiL, and SL-SiL-S. Silt loam was taken from the humus layer, which is more conducive to plant growth than other layers, and it was allocated to the first layer in the four profiles, while sand and silt loam underlay the silt loam layer. Column experiments and Hydrus-1D simulation of the vertical infiltration and drainage process were performed: (1) The simulated results showed that when the sand layer underlay the sandy loam layer (SL-SiL and SL-S-SiL), the sandy loam layer could hold more water than the silt loam layer underlaying the sandy loam layer (SL-SiL and SL-SiL-S). The water content of the sandy loam layer in SL-SiL (95 cm) and SL-S-SiL (95 cm) was 28.3% higher than SL-SiL (74 cm) and 10.5% higher than SL-SiL-S (86 cm). (2) Both the measured and simulated cumulative infiltration and wetting front penetration time were positively related to the thickness of the silt loam layer and negatively related to the thickness of the sand layer. (3) The simulated infiltration rate, accumulation infiltration, and wetting front of the first layer were unaffected by the texture of the underlying layer. According to multi-criteria decision analysis, SL-S-SiL had the best water holding capacity and was suggested for land reclamation in the open pit mine in our research.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Investigation of hydrogeologic processes in a dipping layer structure: 1. The flow barrier effect [J].
Alfnes, E ;
Kinzelbach, W ;
Aagaard, P .
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2004, 69 (3-4) :157-172
[2]   Developing an optimization model in drip fertigation management to consider environmental issues and supply plant requirements [J].
Azad, Nasrin ;
Behmanesh, Javad ;
Rezaverdinejad, Vahid ;
Abbasi, Fariborz ;
Navabian, Maryam .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2018, 208 :344-356
[3]   A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Otaghsara, S. Khanmohammadi ;
Yazdani, Morteza ;
Ignatius, Joshua .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (17) :13051-13069
[4]   SWAP, CropSyst and MACRO comparison in two contrasting soils cropped with maize in Northern Italy [J].
Bonfante, A. ;
Basile, A. ;
Acutis, M. ;
De Mascellis, R. ;
Manna, P. ;
Perego, A. ;
Terribile, F. .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2010, 97 (07) :1051-1062
[5]   A comprehensive numerical analysis of the hydraulic behavior of a permeable pavement [J].
Brunetti, Giuseppe ;
Simunek, Jiri ;
Piro, Patrizia .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 540 :1146-1161
[6]   Spatial prediction of temporal soil moisture dynamics using HYDRUS-1D [J].
Chen, Min ;
Willgoose, Garry R. ;
Saco, Patricia M. .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2014, 28 (02) :171-185
[7]   SIMULATION OF SOIL-WATER DYNAMICS IN LAYERED SOILS [J].
HILLEL, D ;
TALPAZ, H .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1977, 123 (01) :54-62
[8]   Impact of Textural Layering on Water Retention Within Drained Sand Profiles [J].
Huang, Mingbin ;
Spies, Jess ;
Barbour, S. Lee ;
Si, Bing Cheng ;
Zettl, Julie .
SOIL SCIENCE, 2013, 178 (09) :496-504
[9]  
Huang MB, 2011, CAN J SOIL SCI, V91, P169, DOI [10.4141/CJSS09118, 10.4141/cjss09118]
[10]  
Huang MB, 2011, CAN J SOIL SCI, V91, P199, DOI [10.4141/cjss10012, 10.4141/CJSS10012]