ERP investigation of transient attentional selection of single and multiple locations within touch

被引：19

作者：

Forster, Bettina ^{[1
]}

Gillmeister, Helge ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] City Univ London, Dept Psychol, London EC1V 0HB, England

[2] Univ Essex, Dept Psychol, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England

来源：

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY | 2011年 / 48卷 / 06期

基金：

英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;

关键词：

Transient attention; Somatosensation; ERP; Tactile cueing; Spatial selection; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; NEURAL MECHANISMS; SPATIAL ATTENTION;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01147.x

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

Mechanisms underlying pure tactile attentional selection were investigated. Tactile imperative stimuli were preceded by symbolic tactile cues directing attention to the left or right (directional cues), or to both hands (non-directional cues). Comparison of ERP waveforms on directional and non-directional cue trials showed that attentional modulations at N140 and P200 components reflect mainly enhancement of stimuli at the attended, while longer latency modulations reflect mainly suppression of processing of stimuli at the unattended location. This pattern of results differs from analogous studies involving other modalities suggesting that different mechanisms underlie pure tactile attention. Furthermore, ERP waveforms on non-directional cue trials were enhanced in comparison to directional cue trials at the P100 component and at longer latencies, indicating that tactile attentional mechanisms may differ when attending to one compared to multiple locations.

引用

页码：788 / 796

页数：9

共 17 条

[1] Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention [J].

Chica, Ana B. ;

Sanabria, Daniel ;

Lupianez, Juan ;

Spence, Charles .

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 179 (03) :353-364

[2] Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention [J].

Moore, Tirin ;

Zirnsak, Marc .

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 :47-72

[3] Covert attention in touch: Behavioral and ERP evidence for costs and benefits [J].

Forster, B ;

Eimer, M .

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 42 (02) :171-179

[4] ERP correlates of tactile spatial attention differ under intra- and intermodal conditions [J].

Forster, Bettina ;

Sambo, Chiara F. ;

Pavone, Enea F. .

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 82 (03) :227-233

[5] Biasing the brain's attentional set: I. Cue driven deployments of intersensory selective attention [J].

Foxe, JJ ;

Simpson, GV ;

Ahlfors, SP ;

Saron, CD .

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 166 (3-4) :370-392

[6] Attention to somatosensory events is directly linked to the preparation for action [J].

Galazky, Imke ;

Schuetze, Hartmut ;

Noesselt, Toemme ;

Hopf, Jens-Max ;

Heinze, Hans-Jochen ;

Schoenfeld, Mircea Ariel .

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 279 (1-2) :93-98

[7] Preparatory slow potentials and event-related potentials in an auditory cued attention task [J].

Golob, EJ ;

Pratt, H ;

Starr, A .

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (10) :1544-1557

[8] EFFECTS OF SPATIAL CUEING ON LUMINANCE DETECTABILITY - PSYCHOPHYSICAL AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR EARLY SELECTION [J].

LUCK, SJ ;

HILLYARD, SA ;

MOULOUA, M ;

WOLDORFF, MG ;

CLARK, VP ;

HAWKINS, HL .

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1994, 20 (04) :887-904

[9] SELECTIVE ATTENTION GATES VISUAL PROCESSING IN THE EXTRASTRIATE CORTEX [J].

MORAN, J ;

DESIMONE, R .

SCIENCE, 1985, 229 (4715) :782-784

[10] Voluntary attention modulates fMRI activity in human MT-MST [J].

OCraven, KM ;

Rosen, BR ;

Kwong, KK ;

Treisman, A ;

Savoy, RL .

NEURON, 1997, 18 (04) :591-598

← 1 2 →