Deep learning reconstruction allows low-dose imaging while maintaining image quality: comparison of deep learning reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT

被引:21
作者
Tamura, Akio [1 ]
Mukaida, Eisuke [1 ]
Ota, Yoshitaka [2 ]
Nakamura, Iku [3 ]
Arakita, Kazumasa [4 ]
Yoshioka, Kunihiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Iwate Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Morioka, Iwate 0283695, Japan
[2] Iwate Med Univ Hosp, Div Cent Radiol, Morioka, Iwate, Japan
[3] Iwate Med Univ, Sch Med, Morioka, Iwate, Japan
[4] Canon Med Syst Corp, Healthcare IT Dev Ctr, Otawara, Japan
关键词
Computed tomography (CT); contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR); deep learning reconstruction (DLR); noise reduction; advanced intelligent clear-IQ engine (AiCE); OBESE-PATIENTS; DETECTABILITY; ANGIOGRAPHY; IMPROVEMENT; MDCT;
D O I
10.21037/qims-21-1216
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We aimed to compare the radiation dose and image quality of a low-dose abdominal computed tomography (CT) protocol reconstructed with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with those of a routine-dose protocol reconstructed with hybrid-iterative reconstruction. This retrospective study enrolled 71 patients [61 men; average age, 71.9 years; mean body mass index (BMI), 24.3 kg/m(2)] who underwent both low-dose abdominal CT with DLR [advanced intelligent clear-IQ engine (AiCE)] and routine-dose abdominal CT with hybrid-iterative reconstruction [adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D)]. Radiation dose parameters included volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), effective dose (ED), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Mean image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Image noise was measured in the hepatic parenchyma and bilateral erector spinae muscles. Moreover, subjective assessment of perceived image quality and diagnostic acceptability was performed. The low-dose protocol helped reduce the CTDIvol by 44.3%, ED by 43.7%, and SSDE by 44.9%. Moreover, the noise was significantly lower and CNR significantly higher with the low-dose protocol than with the normal-dose protocol (P<0.001). In the subjective assessment of image quality, there was no significant difference between the protocols with regard to image noise. Overall, AiCE was superior to AIDR 3D in terms of diagnostic acceptability (P=0.001). The use of AiCE can reduce overall radiation dose by more than 40% without loss of image quality compared to routine-dose abdominal CT with AIDR 3D.
引用
收藏
页码:2977 / 2984
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is it possible to use low-dose deep learning reconstruction for the detection of liver metastases on CT routinely?
    Lyu, Peijie
    Liu, Nana
    Harrawood, Brian
    Solomon, Justin
    Wang, Huixia
    Chen, Yan
    Rigiroli, Francesca
    Ding, Yuqin
    Schwartz, Fides Regina
    Jiang, Hanyu
    Lowry, Carolyn
    Wang, Luotong
    Samei, Ehsan
    Gao, Jianbo
    Marin, Daniele
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (03) : 1629 - 1640
  • [22] The value of using a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm of thinner slice thickness to balance the image noise and spatial resolution in low-dose abdominal CT
    Wang, Huan
    Li, Xinyu
    Wang, Tianze
    Li, Jianying
    Sun, Tianze
    Chen, Lihong
    Cheng, Yannan
    Jia, Xiaoqian
    Niu, Xinyi
    Guo, Jianxin
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2023, 13 (03) : 1814 - 1824
  • [23] Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Abdominal CT Protocols in Obese Patients: Assessment of Image Quality, Radiation Dose, and Low-Contrast Detectability in a Phantom
    Schindera, Sebastian T.
    Odedra, Devang
    Mercer, Diego
    Thipphavong, Seng
    Chou, Paul
    Szucs-Farkas, Zsolt
    Rogalla, Patrik
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (02) : W146 - W152
  • [24] Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Versus Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Dose Abdominal CT for Urolithiasis
    Botsikas, Diomidis
    Stefanelli, Salvatore
    Boudabbous, Sana
    Toso, Seema
    Becker, Christoph D.
    Montet, Xavier
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 203 (02) : 336 - 340
  • [25] The impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose in thoracic and abdominal CT
    Kalmar, Peter I.
    Quehenberger, Franz
    Steiner, Juergen
    Lutfi, Andre
    Bohlsen, Dennis
    Talakic, Emina
    Hassler, Eva Maria
    Schoellnast, Helmut
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (08) : 1416 - 1420
  • [26] CLEAR: Comprehensive Learning Enabled Adversarial Reconstruction for Subtle Structure Enhanced Low-Dose CT Imaging
    Zhang, Yikun
    Hu, Dianlin
    Zhao, Qianlong
    Quan, Guotao
    Liu, Jin
    Liu, Qiegeng
    Zhang, Yi
    Coatrieux, Gouenou
    Chen, Yang
    Yu, Hengyong
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2021, 40 (11) : 3089 - 3101
  • [27] Image quality assessment of an iterative reconstruction algorithm applied to abdominal CT imaging
    Funama, Yoshinori
    Taguchi, Katsuyuki
    Utsunomiya, Daisuke
    Oda, Seitaro
    Katahira, Kazuhiro
    Tokuyasu, Shinichi
    Yamashita, Yasuyuki
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 30 (04): : 527 - 534
  • [28] Deep learning-based image domain reconstruction enhances image quality and pulmonary nodule detection in ultralow-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V
    Ye, Kai
    Xu, Libo
    Pan, Boyang
    Li, Jie
    Li, Meijiao
    Yuan, Huishu
    Gong, Nan-Jie
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025, : 3739 - 3749
  • [29] Image quality of iterative reconstruction in cranial CT imaging: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR)
    Notohamiprodjo, S.
    Deak, Z.
    Meurer, F.
    Maertz, F.
    Mueck, F. G.
    Geyer, L. L.
    Wirth, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (01) : 140 - 146
  • [30] Comparison of a Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Algorithm with Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms for Pediatric Abdominopelvic CT
    Son, Wookon
    Kim, MinWoo
    Hwang, Jae-Yeon
    Kim, Yong-Woo
    Park, Chankue
    Choo, Ki Seok
    Kim, Tae Un
    Jang, Joo Yeon
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 23 (07) : 752 - 762