Impact of governance structures on environmental disclosures in the Middle East and Africa

被引:58
作者
Kilincarslan, Erhan [1 ]
Elmagrhi, Mohamed H. [2 ]
Li, Zezeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Huddersfield, Dept Accounting Finance & Econ, Huddersfield, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Swansea Univ, Sch Management, Dept Accounting & Finance, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
来源
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY | 2020年 / 20卷 / 04期
关键词
Board characteristics; Corporate governance structures; Environmental disclosures; Middle East and Africa; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARACTERISTICS; INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; INFORMATION DISCLOSURE; BOARD CHARACTERISTICS; MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR; GENDER DIVERSITY; FIRM; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1108/CG-08-2019-0250
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aims to investigate the impact of corporate governance structures on environmental disclosure practices in the Middle East and Africa (MEA). Design/methodology/approach The research model uses a panel data set of 121 publicly listed (non-financial and non-utility) firms from 11 MEA countries over the period 2010-2017, uses alternative dependent variables and regression techniques and is applied to various sub-groups to improve robustness. Findings The empirical results strongly indicate that MEA firms with high governance disclosures tend to have better environmental disclosure practices. The board characteristics of gender diversity, size, CEO/chairperson duality and audit committee size impact positively on MEA firms' voluntary environmental disclosures, whereas board independence has a negative influence. Research limitations/implications This study advances research on the relationship between corporate governance structures and environmental disclosure practices in MEA countries, but is limited to firms for which data are available from Bloomberg. Practical implications The results have important practical implications for MEA policymakers and regulators. The positive impact of board gender diversity on firms' environmental disclosures, policy reforms should aim to increase female directors. MEA corporations aiming to be more environmentally friendly should recruit women to top managerial positions. Originality/value This is thought to be the first study to provide insights from the efficiency and legitimation perspectives of neo-institutional theory to explain the relationship between MEA firms' internal governance structures and environmental disclosures.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 763
页数:25
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]   Audit committee characteristics and restatements [J].
Abbott, LJ ;
Parker, S ;
Peters, GF .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2004, 23 (01) :69-87
[2]   Codes of good governance worldwide: What is the trigger? [J].
Aguilera, RV ;
Cuervo-Cazurra, A .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2004, 25 (03) :415-443
[3]   Increased firm profitability under a nationwide environmental information disclosure program? Evidence from China [J].
Ahmad, Najid ;
Li, Hong-Zhou ;
Tian, Xian-Liang .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 230 :1176-1187
[4]  
Akrout M M., 2013, Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, V2, P46
[5]   Corporate Boards and Ownership Structure as Antecedents of Corporate Governance Disclosure in Saudi Arabian Publicly Listed Corporations [J].
Al-Bassam, Waleed M. ;
Ntim, Collins G. ;
Opong, Kwaku K. ;
Downs, Yvonne .
BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2018, 57 (02) :335-377
[6]   The effect of ownership structure on dividend policy: evidence from Turkey [J].
Al-Najjar, Basil ;
Kilincarslan, Erhan .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2016, 16 (01) :135-161
[7]  
Al-Rawashdeh R., 2015, ENV RES ENG MANAG, V4, P54, DOI DOI 10.5755/J01.EREM.70.4.7743
[8]  
Al-Shaer H., 2015, IMPACT CORPORATE ENV
[9]  
Alazzani A, 2017, CORP GOV-INT J BUS S, V17, P266, DOI 10.1108/CG-12-2015-0161
[10]   Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review [J].
Ali, Waris ;
Frynas, Jedrzej George ;
Mahmood, Zeeshan .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 24 (04) :273-294