Greenhouse gas emissions from beef production systems in Denmark and Sweden

被引:55
|
作者
Mogensen, L. [1 ]
Kristensen, T. [1 ]
Nielsen, N. I. [2 ]
Spleth, P. [2 ]
Henriksson, M. [3 ]
Swensson, C. [3 ]
Hessle, A. [4 ]
Vestergaard, M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Agroecol, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Knowledge Ctr Agr, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Biosyst & Technol, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
[4] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Environm & Hlth, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
[5] Aarhus Univ, Dept Anim Sci, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
关键词
Beef production system; Greenhouse gas emissions; LCA; Land use change; Soil carbon changes; SOIL CARBON CHANGES; METHANE PRODUCTION; DAIRY; SEQUESTRATION; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT; PASTURES; MODEL; LCA; N2O;
D O I
10.1016/j.livsci.2015.01.021
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The purpose of the study was to define and describe typical beef production systems in Denmark and Sweden and estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions including contribution from soil carbon changes and land use change (LUC) in a life cycle perspective (LCA). Five typical Danish (DK) and four typical Swedish (SE) systems were identified; hereof three systems with beef from beef breed cattle and six systems with beef from bull calves derived from dairy production system (including steers). The beef breed systems include an extensive system (DK) and two intensive systems (SE, DK). In the systems with beef from dairy bull calves, the bull calves were slaughtered at different ages; 9.0 months (SE), 9.4 months (DK), 11.5 months (DK), 19.0 months (SE) and at 25.0 months in the two systems with steers (DK, SE). Feed use and carbon footprint (CF) per kg meat were positively correlated. Beef from dairy bull calves slaughtered between 9.0 and 19.0 months had the lowest CF (8.9-11.5 kg CO2/kg carcass) and feed use (7.3-11.1 kg DM/kg carcass). The steer systems had a CF of 16.6-17.0 kg CO2/kg carcass and feed use of 13.2-15.5 kg DM/kg carcass. The highest CF and feed use were seen for beef breed systems at 23.1-29.7 kg CO2/kg carcass and 20.9-29.8 kg DM/kg carcass, respectively. The GHG contribution from LUC was positively correlated to the use of arable land. Beef from dairy bull calves had the lowest LUC contribution (13-1.6 kg CO2/kg carcass) from a land use of 9.4-11.5 m(2)/kg carcass. The highest LUC contribution (2.5-3.5 kg CO2/kg carcass) and land use of 17.3-24.7 m(2)/kg carcass was seen for beef from beef breed systems, the Swedish dairy bull calf slaughtered at 19 month, and the Danish steer. Besides arable land, the beef breed systems also used permanent pastures that were assumed not to contribute to LUC. Carbon (C) sequestration from crop residues and use of manure had a mitigating effect on GHG emission in all beef systems. The lowest C sequestration was seen for systems with beef from dairy bull calves slaughtered between 9 and 19 months, making up 0.2-0.9 kg CO2/kg carcass, and the highest C sequestration was for the steer production and the beef breed systems, contributing between 23 and 4.8 kg CO2/kg carcass. The present study supports the hypothesis that feed use per kg carcass weight is a main driver for variation in greenhouse gas emission, land use change and soil carbon changes for beef meat sourced from different beef production systems. For the carbon footprint per kg carcass there was a positive correlation with feed use and therefore also the lowest carbon footprint per kg carcass in systems with the lowest feed intake, such as bull calves from dairy production. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 143
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Large Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Temperate Peatland Pasture
    Teh, Yit Arn
    Silver, Whendee L.
    Sonnentag, Oliver
    Detto, Matteo
    Kelly, Maggi
    Baldocchi, Dennis D.
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2011, 14 (02) : 311 - 325
  • [32] Bioeconomic and greenhouse gas emissions modelling of the factors influencing technical efficiency of temperate grassland-based suckler calf-to-beef production systems
    Taylor, R. F.
    McGee, M.
    Kelly, A. K.
    Crosson, P.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2020, 183
  • [33] EVALUATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM THREE CONTRASTING INTEGRATED CROP AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS DURING 1991-2016 IN GANSU OF CHINA
    Yan, Zhengang
    Hou, Fujiang
    Yan, Tianhai
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2019, 56 (02): : 469 - 480
  • [34] Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Row Crop, Agroforestry, and Forested Land Use Systems in Floodplain Soils
    Ansari, Jamshid
    Davis, Morgan P.
    Anderson, Stephen H.
    Eivazi, Frieda
    Bardhan, Sougata
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2023, 234 (04)
  • [35] Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cold Chains in Agrifood Systems
    Flammini, Alessandro
    Adzmir, Hanif
    Pattison, Richard
    Karl, Kevin
    Allouche, Yosr
    Tubiello, Francesco Nicola
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (21)
  • [36] Modeling greenhouse gas emissions from riverine systems: A review
    Panique-Casso, Diego G.
    Goethals, Peter
    Ho, Long
    WATER RESEARCH, 2024, 250
  • [37] Variability in greenhouse gas emission intensity of semi-intensive suckler cow beef production systems
    Samsonstuen, Stine
    Aby, Bente A.
    Crosson, Paul
    Beauchemin, Karen A.
    Wetlesen, Marit S.
    Bonesmo, Helge
    Aass, Laila
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2020, 239
  • [38] Greenhouse gas emissions of corn-ethanol production in China
    Yang, Q.
    Chen, G. Q.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2013, 252 : 176 - 184
  • [39] Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef Cattle Breeding Based on the Ecological Cycle Model
    Guo, Hongpeng
    Su, Zixu
    Yang, Xiao
    Xu, Shuang
    Pan, Hong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (15)
  • [40] Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options for German wine production
    Ponstein, Helena J.
    Meyer-Aurich, Andreas
    Prochnow, Annette
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 : 800 - 809