Greenhouse gas emissions from beef production systems in Denmark and Sweden

被引:55
|
作者
Mogensen, L. [1 ]
Kristensen, T. [1 ]
Nielsen, N. I. [2 ]
Spleth, P. [2 ]
Henriksson, M. [3 ]
Swensson, C. [3 ]
Hessle, A. [4 ]
Vestergaard, M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Agroecol, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Knowledge Ctr Agr, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Biosyst & Technol, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
[4] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Environm & Hlth, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
[5] Aarhus Univ, Dept Anim Sci, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
关键词
Beef production system; Greenhouse gas emissions; LCA; Land use change; Soil carbon changes; SOIL CARBON CHANGES; METHANE PRODUCTION; DAIRY; SEQUESTRATION; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT; PASTURES; MODEL; LCA; N2O;
D O I
10.1016/j.livsci.2015.01.021
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The purpose of the study was to define and describe typical beef production systems in Denmark and Sweden and estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions including contribution from soil carbon changes and land use change (LUC) in a life cycle perspective (LCA). Five typical Danish (DK) and four typical Swedish (SE) systems were identified; hereof three systems with beef from beef breed cattle and six systems with beef from bull calves derived from dairy production system (including steers). The beef breed systems include an extensive system (DK) and two intensive systems (SE, DK). In the systems with beef from dairy bull calves, the bull calves were slaughtered at different ages; 9.0 months (SE), 9.4 months (DK), 11.5 months (DK), 19.0 months (SE) and at 25.0 months in the two systems with steers (DK, SE). Feed use and carbon footprint (CF) per kg meat were positively correlated. Beef from dairy bull calves slaughtered between 9.0 and 19.0 months had the lowest CF (8.9-11.5 kg CO2/kg carcass) and feed use (7.3-11.1 kg DM/kg carcass). The steer systems had a CF of 16.6-17.0 kg CO2/kg carcass and feed use of 13.2-15.5 kg DM/kg carcass. The highest CF and feed use were seen for beef breed systems at 23.1-29.7 kg CO2/kg carcass and 20.9-29.8 kg DM/kg carcass, respectively. The GHG contribution from LUC was positively correlated to the use of arable land. Beef from dairy bull calves had the lowest LUC contribution (13-1.6 kg CO2/kg carcass) from a land use of 9.4-11.5 m(2)/kg carcass. The highest LUC contribution (2.5-3.5 kg CO2/kg carcass) and land use of 17.3-24.7 m(2)/kg carcass was seen for beef from beef breed systems, the Swedish dairy bull calf slaughtered at 19 month, and the Danish steer. Besides arable land, the beef breed systems also used permanent pastures that were assumed not to contribute to LUC. Carbon (C) sequestration from crop residues and use of manure had a mitigating effect on GHG emission in all beef systems. The lowest C sequestration was seen for systems with beef from dairy bull calves slaughtered between 9 and 19 months, making up 0.2-0.9 kg CO2/kg carcass, and the highest C sequestration was for the steer production and the beef breed systems, contributing between 23 and 4.8 kg CO2/kg carcass. The present study supports the hypothesis that feed use per kg carcass weight is a main driver for variation in greenhouse gas emission, land use change and soil carbon changes for beef meat sourced from different beef production systems. For the carbon footprint per kg carcass there was a positive correlation with feed use and therefore also the lowest carbon footprint per kg carcass in systems with the lowest feed intake, such as bull calves from dairy production. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 143
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Greenhouse gas emissions from selected horticultural production systems in a cold temperate climate
    Lloyd, Kaitlin
    Madramootoo, Chandra A.
    Edwards, Kerri P.
    Grant, Angela
    GEODERMA, 2019, 349 : 45 - 55
  • [22] Mitigating Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions from Beef Cattle Feedlot Production: A System Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Yue
    Li, Xinrong
    Yang, Jinfeng
    Tian, Zhuang
    Sun, Qinping
    Xue, Wentao
    Dong, Hongmin
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (19) : 11232 - 11242
  • [23] Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Crop Production
    Strokov, A. S.
    HERALD OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2021, 91 (02) : 197 - 203
  • [24] Contribution of milk production to global greenhouse gas emissions
    Hagemann, Martin
    Ndambi, Asaah
    Hemme, Torsten
    Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2012, 19 (02) : 390 - 402
  • [25] Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada - Evaluation using farm-based life cycle assessment
    Beauchemin, K. A.
    Janzen, H. H.
    Little, S. M.
    McAllister, T. A.
    McGinn, S. M.
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 : 663 - 677
  • [26] A comparison of methods to quantify greenhouse gas emissions of cropping systems in LCA
    Goglio, R.
    Smith, W. N.
    Grant, B. B.
    Desjardins, R. L.
    Gao, X.
    Hanis, K.
    Tenuta, M.
    Campbell, C. A.
    McConkey, B. G.
    Nemecek, T.
    Burgess, P. J.
    Williams, A. G.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 4010 - 4017
  • [27] Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from production of compost bedding on a dairy farm
    Fillingham, M. A.
    VanderZaag, A. C.
    Burtt, S.
    Balde, H.
    Ngwabie, N. M.
    Smith, W.
    Hakami, A.
    Wagner-Riddle, C.
    Bittman, S.
    MacDonald, D.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 70 : 45 - 52
  • [28] Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Crop Production
    A. S. Strokov
    Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2021, 91 : 197 - 203
  • [29] Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system
    Casey, JW
    Holden, NM
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2005, 86 (01) : 97 - 114
  • [30] Lifetime greenhouse gas emissions from offshore hydrogen production
    Davies, Abigail J.
    Hastings, Astley
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 10 : 1538 - 1554