Magnetostatic simulations with consideration of exterior domains using the scaled boundary finite element method

被引:7
作者
Birk, Carolin [1 ]
Reichel, Maximilian [2 ]
Schroeder, Joerg [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Inst Struct Anal, Univ Str 15, D-45141 Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Duisburg Essen, Inst Mech, Univ Str 15, D-45141 Essen, Germany
关键词
Micromagnetics; Finite element method; Scaled boundary finite element method; FIELD CALCULATION; UNBOUNDED-DOMAINS; TIME-DOMAIN; CELL METHOD; MICROMAGNETICS; GENERATION; MATRIX;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2022.115362
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this work we propose a hybrid SBFEM-FEM approach for the efficient calculation of magnetic stray fields in unbounded domains. In magnetostatic boundary value problems, the interaction between the magnetic solid, externally applied magnetic fields and the surrounding exterior domain is of crucial importance. This interaction generates the magnetic stray field, which diminishes in intensity with increasing distance to the solid. For this reason, the overall infinite domain is simulated using a hybrid formulation of the scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM) and the finite element method. To this end, the entire domain is divided into a finite and an infinite sub-region, referred to as the interior and the exterior domain. While the interior domain is modeled using finite elements, the exterior domain is reduced onto the boundary of the interior domain by using the SBFEM. The latter provides a semi-analytical solution of the considered magnetostatic problem in an unbounded domain, where the externally applied magnetic fields are taken into account. The advantage of this method is the rigorous representation of the surrounding exterior domain without an explicit discretization. Compared to completely discretized systems, significantly better results can be obtained with smaller systems of equations.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Numerical methods for the stray-field calculation: A comparison of recently developed algorithms [J].
Abert, Claas ;
Exl, Lukas ;
Selke, Gunnar ;
Drews, Andre ;
Schrefl, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS, 2013, 326 :176-185
[2]   BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS FOR THE NUMERICAL-SOLUTION OF ELLIPTIC-EQUATIONS IN EXTERIOR REGIONS [J].
BAYLISS, A ;
GUNZBURGER, M ;
TURKEL, E .
SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1982, 42 (02) :430-451
[3]   A PERFECTLY MATCHED LAYER FOR THE ABSORPTION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC-WAVES [J].
BERENGER, JP .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1994, 114 (02) :185-200
[4]   Coupled acoustic response of two-dimensional bounded and unbounded domains using doubly-asymptotic open boundaries [J].
Birk, C. ;
Liu, L. ;
Song, Ch. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2016, 310 :252-284
[5]   Comparison between different approaches for fast and efficient 3-D BEM computations [J].
Buchau, A ;
Rucker, WM ;
Rain, O ;
Rischmüller, V ;
Kurz, S ;
Rjasanow, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2003, 39 (03) :1107-1110
[6]   A review of finite element open boundary techniques for static and quasi-static electromagnetic field problems [J].
Chen, Q ;
Konrad, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1997, 33 (01) :663-676
[7]   Time-domain analysis of wave propagation in 3-D unbounded domains by the scaled boundary finite element method [J].
Chen, Xiaojun ;
Birk, Carolin ;
Song, Chongmin .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2015, 75 :171-182
[8]  
Coey JMD, 2009, Magnetism and magnetic materials, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511845000
[9]   Micromagnetic modelling - the current state of the art [J].
Fidler, J ;
Schrefl, T .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2000, 33 (15) :R135-R156
[10]   HYBRID METHOD FOR COMPUTING DEMAGNETIZING FIELDS [J].
FREDKIN, DR ;
KOEHLER, TR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1990, 26 (02) :415-417