Comparison between a new ultrasound densitometer and single-photon absorptiometry

被引:0
|
作者
Murgia, C [1 ]
Cagnacci, A [1 ]
Paoletti, AM [1 ]
Pilia, I [1 ]
Meloni, A [1 ]
Melis, GB [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CAGLIARI,INST OBSTET & GYNAECOL,CAGLIARI,ITALY
来源
MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY | 1996年 / 3卷 / 03期
关键词
bone densitometry; osteopenia; osteoporosis; single-photon absorptiometry; ultrasound bone velocity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Bone mass measurements were performed in a group of 100 healthy women (ages 22-74 years) with both a densitometric technique measuring ultrasound bone velocity (UBV) at the distal metaphyses of the first phalanges of the hand and single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) applied at the distal forearm and ultradistal radius, A significant (p < 0.00001) difference was found in both UBV and bone mineral density (BMD) values between premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Simple regression analysis showed a highly significant relationship (p < 0.0001) between UBV measured at proximal phalanges and BMD measured at the distal forearm (r = 0.693) and ultradistal radius (r = 0.643), There was no correlation between age and both UBV and BMD in premenopausal women. By contrast, a significant correlation was found between UBV and age in postmenopausal women (p < 0.0001; r = 0.510). A similar correlation with age was found for BMD measured at the distal forearm (p < 0.0001; r = 0.458) and ultradistal radius (p ( 0.0002; r = 0.435). Changes of UBV were also significantly related to years since menopause (p < 0.0001; r = 0.526), as were BMD variations at the distal forearm (p < 0.0001; r = 0.451) and ultradistal radius (p < 0.008; r = 0.402). The reproducibility of the methods (coefficient of variation) was 0.46% for UBV and 0.92% for SPA. Our findings seem to indicate that UBV measured at the phalanges may have the same clinical applications as BMD measured at the distal forearm and ultradistal radius.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 153
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] APPENDICULAR AND VERTEBRAL BONE MASS IN ANKYLOSING-SPONDYLITIS - A COMPARISON OF PLAIN RADIOGRAPHS WITH SINGLE-PHOTON AND DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY AND WITH QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    DEVOGELAER, JP
    MALDAGUE, B
    MALGHEM, J
    DEDEUXCHAISNES, CN
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1992, 35 (09): : 1062 - 1067
  • [32] Single-Photon Nanoantennas
    Koenderink, A. Femius
    ACS PHOTONICS, 2017, 4 (04): : 710 - 722
  • [33] Single-photon source
    Lerner, Eric J.
    Industrial Physicist, 2002, 8 (02):
  • [34] NONLOCALITY OF A SINGLE-PHOTON
    GREENBERGER, DM
    HORNE, MA
    ZEILINGER, A
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1995, 75 (10) : 2064 - 2064
  • [35] SINGLE-PHOTON IMAGING
    GARCIA, EV
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1995, 2 : S120 - S121
  • [36] Single-photon sources
    Oxborrow, M
    Sinclair, AG
    CONTEMPORARY PHYSICS, 2005, 46 (03) : 173 - 206
  • [37] Single-photon sources
    Lounis, B
    Orrit, M
    REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS, 2005, 68 (05) : 1129 - 1179
  • [38] Single-photon vibrometry
    Rehain, Patrick
    Ramanathan, Jeevanandha
    Sua, Yong Meng
    Zhu, Shenyu
    Tafone, Daniel
    Huang, Yu-Ping
    OPTICS LETTERS, 2021, 46 (17) : 4346 - 4349
  • [39] Single-Photon Optomechanics
    Nunnenkamp, A.
    Borkje, K.
    Girvin, S. M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2011, 107 (06)
  • [40] Single-photon subtraction
    Noriaki Horiuchi
    Nature Photonics, 2017, 11 : 532 - 532