Bullying at Work: Cognitive Appraisal of Negative Acts, Coping, Wellbeing, and Performance

被引:70
作者
Hewett, Rebecca [1 ]
Liefooghe, Andreas [2 ]
Visockaite, Gintare [2 ]
Roongrerngsuke, Siriyupa [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Greenwich, Sch Business, London, England
[2] Birkbeck Univ London, Dept Org Psychol, London, England
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, Sasin Grad Inst Business Adm, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
bullying; cognitive appraisal theory; coping; EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE; WORKPLACE HARASSMENT; MEASURING EXPOSURE; HEALTH; CONSEQUENCES; ASSOCIATIONS; DEFINITIONS; PERCEPTIONS; PREVALENCE; BEHAVIORS;
D O I
10.1037/ocp0000064
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The negative outcomes of experiencing workplace bullying are well documented, but a strong theoretical explanation for this has been relatively neglected. We draw on cognitive appraisal theory to suggest that individuals' appraisals of and responses to negative acts at work will moderate the impact of said acts on wellbeing and performance outcomes. In a large study (N = 3,217) in Southeast Asia, we examine moderators in the form of (a) the extent to which individuals identify themselves as being bullied and (b) the coping strategies that individuals use to deal with negative acts. We find that these factors do moderate the impact of experiencing negative acts, in particular work-related negative acts. When individuals are subject to work-related negative acts but do not see themselves as being bullied they report higher levels of performance than those who do identify themselves as being bullied. Problem-focused coping was found to be effective for those sometimes targeted, but for persistent targets was detrimental to wellbeing. The present research has important implications for bullying research in examining factors that contribute to outcomes of bullying.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 84
页数:14
相关论文
共 82 条
[31]   Self-Other Agreement in Job Performance Ratings: A Meta-Analytic Test of a Process Model [J].
Heidemeier, Heike ;
Moser, Klaus .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (02) :353-370
[32]   Comparing Victim Attributions and Outcomes for Workplace Aggression and Sexual Harassment [J].
Hershcovis, M. Sandy ;
Barling, Julian .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (05) :874-888
[33]  
Hofstede G., 1991, Cultures and organizations, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00184-5
[34]  
Hogh Annie., 2001, EUROPEAN J WORK ORG, V10, P485, DOI [10.1080/13594320143000825, DOI 10.1080/13594320143000825]
[35]  
Ireland JL, 1999, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V25, P161, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:3<161::AID-AB1>3.0.CO
[36]  
2-#
[37]   The General Health Questionnaire [J].
Jackson, Craig .
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2007, 57 (01) :79-79
[38]   The world health organization health and work performance questionnaire (HPQ) [J].
Kessler, RC ;
Barber, C ;
Beck, A ;
Berglund, P ;
Cleary, PD ;
McKenas, D ;
Pronk, N ;
Simon, G ;
Stang, P ;
Ustun, TB ;
Wang, P .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2003, 45 (02) :156-174
[39]  
Lazarus R.S., 1984, STRESS APPRAISAL COP, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215
[40]   Definite involuntary childlessness: associations between coping, social support and psychological distress [J].
Lechner, L. ;
Bolman, C. ;
van Dalen, A. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (01) :288-294