What No Child Left Behind Leaves Behind: The Roles of IQ and Self-Control in Predicting Standardized Achievement Test Scores and Report Card Grades

被引:230
作者
Duckworth, Angela L. [1 ]
Quinn, Patrick D. [2 ]
Tsukayama, Eli [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Posit Psychol Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
impulsivity; self-control; achievement; success; personality; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; FLUID INTELLIGENCE; EFFORTFUL CONTROL; WORKING-MEMORY; FIT INDEXES; ADOLESCENTS; DISCIPLINE; SUCCESS; IMPULSIVITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1037/a0026280
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The increasing prominence of standardized testing to assess student learning motivated the current investigation. We propose that standardized achievement test scores assess competencies determined more by intelligence than by self-control, whereas report card grades assess competencies determined more by self-control than by intelligence. In particular, we suggest that intelligence helps students learn and solve problems independent of formal instruction, whereas self-control helps students study, complete homework, and behave positively in the classroom. Two longitudinal, prospective studies of middle school students support predictions from this model. In both samples, IQ predicted changes in standardized achievement test scores over time better than did self-control, whereas self-control predicted changes in report card grades over time better than did IQ. As expected, the effect of self-control on changes in report card grades was mediated in Study 2 by teacher ratings of homework completion and classroom conduct. In a third study, ratings of middle school teachers about the content and purpose of standardized achievement tests and report card grades were consistent with the proposed model. Implications for pedagogy and public policy are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 451
页数:13
相关论文
共 78 条
[31]  
Gottfredson LS, 2002, GENERAL FACTOR OF INTELLIGENCE: HOW GENERAL IS IT?, P331
[32]  
Gresham F., 1990, Social skills rating system, DOI [10.1037/t10269-000, DOI 10.1037/T10269-000]
[33]   STUDENT EVALUATION TECHNIQUES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO GRADE AND CURRICULUM [J].
GULLICKSON, AR .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1985, 79 (02) :96-100
[34]   Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory [J].
Jaeggi, Susanne M. ;
Buschkuehl, Martin ;
Jonides, John ;
Perrig, Walter J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (19) :6829-6833
[35]  
James W., 1899, Talks to Teachers on Psychology: And to Students on Some of Life's Ideals
[36]  
John OP, 1999, BIG 5 TRAIT TAXONOMY, DOI DOI 10.1525/FQ.1998.51.4.04A00260
[37]  
Kelley T. L., 1927, Interpretation of educational measurements
[38]   Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling [J].
Kenny, DA ;
McCoach, DB .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2003, 10 (03) :333-351
[39]  
Kline R. B., 2005, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.15353/CGJSC.V1I1.3787
[40]  
Kohn A., 2000, ED WEEK 0927