Group processes in medical education: learning from social identity theory

被引:163
作者
Burford, Bryan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Med Educ Res Grp, Durham DH1 1TA, England
关键词
MULTISOURCE FEEDBACK; IN-GROUP; STUDENTS; COMMUNICATION; HEALTH; DETERMINANTS; PERCEPTIONS; NURSES; PROFESSIONALISM; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04099.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
CONTEXT The clinical workplace in which doctors learn involves many social groups, including representatives of different professions, clinical specialties and workplace teams. This paper suggests that medical education research does not currently take full account of the effects of group membership, and describes a theoretical approach from social psychology, the social identity approach, which allows those effects to be explored. METHODS The social identity approach has a long history in social psychology and provides an integrated account of group processes, from the adoption of group identity through a process of self-categorisation, to the biases and conflicts between groups. This paper outlines key elements of this theoretical approach and illustrates their relevance to medical education. RESULTS The relevance of the social identity approach is illustrated with reference to a number of areas of medical education. The paper shows how research questions in medical education may be usefully reframed in terms of social identity in ways that allow a deeper exploration of the psychological processes involved. Professional identity and professionalism may be viewed in terms of self-categorisation rather than simply attainment; the salience of different identities may be considered as influences on teamwork and interprofessional learning, and issues in communication and assessment may be considered in terms of intergroup biases. CONCLUSIONS Social identity theory provides a powerful framework with which to consider many areas of medical education. It allows disparate influences on, and consequences of, group membership to be considered as part of an integrated system, and allows assumptions, such as about the nature of professional identity and interprofessional tensions, to be made explicit in the design of research studies. This power to question assumptions and develop deeper and more meaningful research questions may be increasingly relevant as the nature and role of the medical profession change.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 152
页数:10
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
Adams K., 2006, LEARNING HLTH SOCIAL, V5, P55, DOI [10.1111/j.1473-6861.2006.00119.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1473-6861.2006.00119.X]
[2]   Marginalisation of dental students in a shared medical and dental education programme [J].
Ajjawi, Rola ;
Hyde, Sarah ;
Roberts, Chris ;
Nisbet, Gillian .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 43 (03) :238-245
[3]   Interdisciplinary communication: An uncharted source of medical error? [J].
Alvarez, George ;
Coiera, Enrico .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 21 (03) :236-242
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1978, SOCIAL PSYCHOL MINOR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, SOCIAL IDENTITY THEO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology: Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1992, European Review of Social Psychology, DOI [10.1080/14792779243000005, DOI 10.1080/14792779243000005]
[8]   Communicating professional identity in medical socialization: Considering the ideological discourse of morning report [J].
Apker, J ;
Eggly, S .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2004, 14 (03) :411-429
[9]   Republished paper: Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme [J].
Archer, Julian ;
McGraw, Mary ;
Davies, Helena .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 86 (1019) :526-531
[10]  
Ashforth B.E., 2001, SOCIAL IDENTITY PROC, P31, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315800530