A systematic review of academic dishonesty in online learning environments

被引:32
作者
Chiang, Feng-Kuang [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Dan [2 ]
Yu, Wenhao [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ctr Future Educ, Sch Educ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Normal Univ, Dept Educ Technol, Sch Educ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
academic dishonesty; behaviour engineering model; content analysis; online learning; systematic review; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS; CHALLENGE QUESTIONS; PLAGIARISM; BEHAVIOR; ASSESSMENTS; PREDICTORS; UNIVERSITY; USABILITY; INTEGRITY; SECURITY;
D O I
10.1111/jcal.12656
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Backgroud uring the COVID-19 pandemic, online learning has played an increasingly crucial role in the educational system. Academic dishonesty (AD) in online learning is a challenging problem that represents a complex psychological and social phenomenon for learners. However, there is a lack of comprehensive and systematic reviews of AD in online learning environments. Objectives This study presents a systematic study of AD in online learning environments to delineate its trends and uncover potential areas for further research. Methods We conducted this review based on various sources of evidence-based research and followed the guidelines of the PRISMA statement and procedure for selection. After the exclusion criteria were employed, 59 eligible articles were selected and then analysed in a descriptive overview. Two frameworks were identified in the structured content analysis to analyse these articles. One was the framework of Gilbert's Behaviour Engineering Model (BEM), and the other was the types of interventions for online AD, where 36 articles were analysed. Results and Conclusions The descriptive results showed that most studies used quantitative methods and focused on students. The analysis results of influencing factors under the BEM framework showed that the category of environment support and tools accounts for the largest proportion. And the types of interventions for online AD we classified include individual AD & high technological complexity, individual AD & low technological complexity, collective AD & high technological complexity, and collective AD & low technological complexity. These findings provide a comprehensive understanding and guidance of AD in the online environment for relevant managers, designers and developers.
引用
收藏
页码:907 / 928
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A systematic review on machine learning models for online learning and examination systems
    Kaddoura, Sanaa
    Popescu, Daniela Elena
    Hemanth, Jude D.
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2022, 8
  • [42] SELF-REGULATED LEARNING AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS
    Cazan, Ana-Maria
    LET'S BUILD THE FUTURE THROUGH LEARNING INNOVATION!, VOL III, 2014, : 90 - 95
  • [43] Academic dishonesty and monitoring in online exams: a randomized field experiment
    Alguacil, Maite
    Herranz-Zarzoso, Noemi
    Pernias, Jose C.
    Sabater-Grande, Gerardo
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2024, 36 (03) : 835 - 851
  • [44] Academic Dishonesty in Modern Universities: A Review of Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Findings
    Shmeleva, Evgeniia
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SOCIOLOGY-EKONOMICHESKAYA SOTSIOLOGIYA, 2015, 16 (02): : 55 - 79
  • [45] Synthesizing research evidence on self-regulated learning and academic achievement in online and blended learning environments: A scoping review
    Xu, Zhihong
    Zhao, Yingying
    Liew, Jeffrey
    Zhou, Xuan
    Kogut, Ashlynn
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2023, 39
  • [46] How to Best Measure Academic Dishonesty in Students A Systematic Review of Self-Report Assessment Methods and Psychometric Quality
    Fritz, Tanja
    Cruz, Hernan Gonzalez
    Janke, Stefan
    Daumiller, Martin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2024,
  • [47] Cultural Differences in Academic Dishonesty: A Social Learning Perspective
    Nhung T. Hendy
    Nathalie Montargot
    Antigoni Papadimitriou
    Journal of Academic Ethics, 2021, 19 : 49 - 70
  • [48] Evolution of research on honesty and dishonesty in academic work: a bibliometric analysis of two decades
    Mahmud, Saadia
    Ali, Imran
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2023, 33 (01) : 55 - 69
  • [49] Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty in a South African University: A Q-Methodology Approach
    Finchilescu, Gillian
    Cooper, Adam
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2018, 28 (04) : 284 - 301
  • [50] Pharmacy students' views and experiences of Turnitin (R)-an online tool for detecting academic dishonesty
    Sheridan, Janie
    Alany, Raid
    Brake, Dulcie-Jane
    PHARMACY EDUCATION, 2005, 5 : 241 - 250