Types of Supplementary Aids and Services for Students With Significant Support Needs

被引:21
作者
Kurth, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Ruppar, Andrea L. [2 ]
McQueston, Jessica A. [2 ]
McCabe, Katie M. [2 ]
Johnston, Russell [1 ]
Toews, Samantha Gross [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, 1122 West Campus Rd,JRP 541, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI USA
关键词
supplementary aids and services; least restrictive environment; individualized education programs; significant support needs; DISABILITIES; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1177/0022466918791156
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Supplementary aids and services (SAS) have been a provision in special education law since PL 94-142, however, almost no guidance has been provided to help teams make decisions about their appropriate selection and use. In this exploratory study, we explore the types of SAS selected for students with significant support needs using a conventional content analysis of individualized education program (IEPs) from 88 students in Grades K-12. Results illustrate the wide variation in types of SAS chosen for students overall. Curricular accommodations and personnel supports were the most commonly identified supports, while supports to assist students to communicate and make meaning of curriculum (e.g., curricular modifications) were less common, as were less intrusive supports such as peer-assisted learning. Implications for policy, practice, and research are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 218
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, GUID MINN PAR IND ED
[2]   The Promise and Practice of Peer Support Arrangements for Students With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities [J].
Carter, Erik W. .
IDENTIFYING AND ADDRESSING THE SOCIAL ISSUES EXPERIENCED BY INDIVIDUALS WITH IDD, 2017, 52 :141-174
[3]  
Causton-Theoharis J., 2009, PARAPROFESSIONALS HD
[4]  
Downing J.E., 2008, INCLUDING STUDENTS S
[5]  
Etscheidt SK, 1998, EXCEPT CHILDREN, V65, P163
[6]   Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities [J].
Giangreco, MF ;
Edelman, SW ;
Luiselli, TE ;
MacFarland, SZC .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 1997, 64 (01) :7-18
[7]   Revisiting Personnel Utilization in Inclusion-Oriented Schools [J].
Giangreco, Michael F. ;
Suter, Jesse C. ;
Hurley, Sean M. .
JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2013, 47 (02) :121-132
[8]   Teacher Attrition in Special Education: Perspectives From the Field [J].
Hagaman, Jessica L. ;
Casey, Kathryn J. .
TEACHER EDUCATION AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2018, 41 (04) :277-291
[9]   Using ecological assessment in daily program planning for children with disabilities in typical preschool settings [J].
Haney, M ;
Cavallaro, CC .
TOPICS IN EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION, 1996, 16 (01) :66-81
[10]   Three approaches to qualitative content analysis [J].
Hsieh, HF ;
Shannon, SE .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (09) :1277-1288