Clinically Accurate Prediction of Glucose Levels in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes

被引:13
作者
Amar, Yotam [1 ,2 ]
Shilo, Smadar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Oron, Tal [4 ,5 ]
Amar, Eran [1 ,2 ]
Phillip, Moshe [4 ,5 ]
Segal, Eran [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Weizmann Inst Sci, Dept Comp Sci & Appl Math, IL-7610001 Rehovot, Israel
[2] Weizmann Inst Sci, Dept Mol Cell Biol, Rehovot, Israel
[3] Rambam Healthcare Campus, Pediat Diabet Unit, Ruth Rappaport Childrens Hosp, Haifa, Israel
[4] Schneider Childrens Med Ctr Israel, Natl Ctr Childhood Diabet, Jesse Z & Sara Lea Shafer Inst Endocrinol & Diabe, IL-4920235 Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[5] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Glucose prediction; Artificial neural network; Type; 1; diabetes; Clinical accuracy; Continuous glucose monitoring; ARTIFICIAL PANCREAS; NEURAL-NETWORK; TIME PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1089/dia.2019.0435
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Accurate prediction of glucose levels in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is critical both for their glycemic control and for the development of closed-loop systems. Methods: In this study, we utilized real-life, retrospective, continuous glucose monitoring data from 141 T1DM patients (9,083 connection days, 1,592,506 glucose measurements) and in silico data generated by the UVA/Padova T1DM simulator to evaluate different computational methods for glucose prediction. We evaluated the performance of the models using both measures of numerical accuracy, measured by the root mean square error, and clinical accuracy, measured by the percentage of time in each of the Clarke error grid (CEG) zones, and compared the predictions done by autoregressive (AR) models, tree-based methods, artificial neural networks, and a novel model that we devised and optimized for this task. Results: Our novel model, constructed on real-life data, achieved clinical accuracy of 99.3% and 95.8% in predicting the glucose level 30 and 60 min ahead, respectively, and reduced the percentage of glucose predictions in zones C-E of the CEG by 60.6% and 38.4% in these prediction horizons, compared with a standard AR model. The model was superior to all other models across all age groups and achieved higher clinical accuracy in subgroups of patients with high glucose variability and greater time spent in hypoglycemia. Compared with real-life data, when evaluated on in silico data, the model had a higher clinical and numerical accuracy. Conclusions: A model that optimizes for CEG zones may significantly improve clinical accuracy and clinical outcomes of treatment decisions in T1DM patients. Results obtained from simulated data may overestimate the performance of models on real-life data.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 569
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[2]  
Andelin Mervi, 2016, J Diabetes Sci Technol, V10, P876, DOI 10.1177/1932296815626724
[3]   Hypoglycemia in the diabetes control and complications trial [J].
不详 .
DIABETES, 1997, 46 (02) :271-286
[4]   MD-Logic Artificial Pancreas System A pilot study in adults with type 1 diabetes [J].
Atlas, Eran ;
Nimri, Revital ;
Miller, Shahar ;
Grunberg, Eli A. ;
Phillip, Moshe .
DIABETES CARE, 2010, 33 (05) :1072-1076
[5]  
Chollet Francois, 2015, Keras
[6]   EVALUATING CLINICAL ACCURACY OF SYSTEMS FOR SELF-MONITORING OF BLOOD-GLUCOSE [J].
CLARKE, WL ;
COX, D ;
GONDERFREDERICK, LA ;
CARTER, W ;
POHL, SL .
DIABETES CARE, 1987, 10 (05) :622-628
[7]   Artificial Pancreas Past, Present, Future [J].
Cobelli, Claudio ;
Renard, Eric ;
Kovatchev, Boris .
DIABETES, 2011, 60 (11) :2672-2682
[8]   Glucose Variability: Where It Is Important and How to Measure It [J].
DeVries, J. Hans .
DIABETES, 2013, 62 (05) :1405-1408
[9]   Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: Past, Present and Future Algorithmic Challenges [J].
Facchinetti, Andrea .
SENSORS, 2016, 16 (12)
[10]   Deep Neural Networks for Acoustic Modeling in Speech Recognition [J].
Hinton, Geoffrey ;
Deng, Li ;
Yu, Dong ;
Dahl, George E. ;
Mohamed, Abdel-rahman ;
Jaitly, Navdeep ;
Senior, Andrew ;
Vanhoucke, Vincent ;
Patrick Nguyen ;
Sainath, Tara N. ;
Kingsbury, Brian .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2012, 29 (06) :82-97