Ovarian Stimulation in Patients With Cancer: Impact of Letrozole and BRCA Mutations on Fertility Preservation Cycle Outcomes

被引:64
|
作者
Turan, Volkan [1 ,2 ]
Bedoschi, Giuliano [1 ,3 ]
Emirdar, Volkan [1 ]
Moy, Fred [1 ]
Oktay, Kutluk [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Innovat Inst Fertil & Vitro Fertilizat, New York, NY USA
[2] Yeni Yuzyil Univ, GOP Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Lab Mol Reprod & Fertil Preservat, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
BRCA; cancer; embryo cryopreservation; letrozole; ovarian response; BREAST-CANCER; IN-VITRO; EMBRYO CRYOPRESERVATION; REPAIR DEFICIENCY; WOMEN; GONADOTROPIN; AROMATASE; FOLLICLE; SAFETY; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1177/1933719117728800
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) have been introduced to reduce estrogen exposure in women with estrogen-sensitive cancer undergoing ovarian stimulation for oocyte/embryo cryopreservation. There have been questions regarding whether the addition of AI and the presence of BRCA mutations affect cycle outcomes. We sought to determine the impact of letrozole and BRCA mutations on fertility preservation (FP) cycle outcomes of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with an antagonist protocol. Methods: The data were generated by the secondary analysis of a prospective database of all females diagnosed with cancer who underwent embryo or oocyte cryopreservation for FP. The final analysis included 145 patients stimulated with an antagonist protocol either using letrozole combined with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH; LF, n = 118) or rFSH alone (FA, n = 24). Results: The mean number of total (15.6 [7.9] vs 10.2 [7.8]; P = .004) and mature oocytes (10.4 [5.1] vs 7.8 [3.5]; P = .044) and embryos frozen (7.7 [5.3] vs 5.3 [2.7]; P = .043) were significantly higher after LF stimulation versus FA. In the LF group, women with BRCA mutations produced significantly fewer oocytes (11.0 [8.0] vs 16.4 [7.7], P = .015) and embryos (5.1 [4.4] vs 8.2 [4.7], P = .013), compared to those who were mutation negative. After adjusting for age, body mass index, baseline FSH level, and BRCA status, LF protocol still resulted in higher number of total oocytes (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9 to 3.6; P = .002) mature oocyte (95% CI: 0.3 to 1.4; P = .028), and embryo yield (95% CI: 0.7 to 1.4; P = .015). Conclusion: In women with cancer undergoing FP, letrozole appears to enhance response to ovarian stimulation while the presence of BRCA mutations is associated with lower oocyte and embryo yield.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 32
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hereditary breast cancer and fertility preservation outcomes
    Suha Arab
    Togas Tulandi
    William Buckett
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2022, 39 : 1163 - 1168
  • [42] Comparison of Oocyte and Embryo Quality Between Random Start and Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Cycles in Cancer Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation
    Israfilova, Guler
    Sukur, Yavuz Emre
    Ozkavukcu, Sinan
    Sonmezer, Meltem Aksu
    Atabekoglu, Cem Somer
    ozmen, Batuhan
    Berker, Bulent
    Aytac, Rusen
    Koc, Acar
    Sonmezer, Murat
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2021, 28 (08) : 2200 - 2207
  • [43] Oocyte cryopreservation as a fertility preservation measure for cancer patients
    Noyes, Nicole
    Knopman, Jaime M.
    Melzer, Katherine
    Fino, M. Elizabeth
    Friedman, Brooke
    Westphal, Lynn M.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2011, 23 (03) : 323 - 333
  • [44] Is Letrozole needed for controlled ovarian stimulation in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer?
    Revelli, A.
    Porcu, E.
    Setti, P. E. Levi
    Delle Piane, L.
    Merlo, D. F.
    Anserini, P.
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2013, 29 (11) : 993 - 996
  • [45] Maximize the safety and efficacy of fertility preservation by random start/dual ovarian stimulation for early breast cancer patients
    Young, Shih-Hung Richard
    Chang, Yi-En
    Yang, Wei-Chung Vivian
    Lu, Buo-Jia
    Chou, Szu-Yuan
    Chen, Chi -Huang
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 (02): : 330 - 333
  • [46] Fertility preservation in ovarian cancer patients
    Santos, Maria Luis
    Pais, Ana Sofia
    Almeida Santos, Teresa
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 37 (06) : 483 - 489
  • [47] Fertility preservation for cancer patients: treatment gaps and considerations in patients' choices
    Kappy, Michelle
    Lieman, Harry J.
    Pollack, Staci
    Buyuk, Erkan
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2021, 303 (06) : 1617 - 1623
  • [48] BRCA mutations in the manifestation and treatment of ovarian cancer
    Pan, Zimin
    Xie, Xing
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (57) : 97657 - 97670
  • [49] Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with or without letrozole for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Xie, Yanqiu
    Li, Ping
    Deng, Weifen
    Fan, Qi
    Sun, Peng
    Kang, Jiajing
    Wang, Kun
    Shi, Yuhua
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [50] Ovarian stimulation for emergency fertility preservation in cancer patients: A case series study
    Rashidi, Batool Hossein
    Tehrani, Ensiyeh Shahrokh
    Ghaffari, Firouzeh
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2014, 10 : 19 - 21