Ovarian Stimulation in Patients With Cancer: Impact of Letrozole and BRCA Mutations on Fertility Preservation Cycle Outcomes

被引:64
|
作者
Turan, Volkan [1 ,2 ]
Bedoschi, Giuliano [1 ,3 ]
Emirdar, Volkan [1 ]
Moy, Fred [1 ]
Oktay, Kutluk [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Innovat Inst Fertil & Vitro Fertilizat, New York, NY USA
[2] Yeni Yuzyil Univ, GOP Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Lab Mol Reprod & Fertil Preservat, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
BRCA; cancer; embryo cryopreservation; letrozole; ovarian response; BREAST-CANCER; IN-VITRO; EMBRYO CRYOPRESERVATION; REPAIR DEFICIENCY; WOMEN; GONADOTROPIN; AROMATASE; FOLLICLE; SAFETY; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1177/1933719117728800
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) have been introduced to reduce estrogen exposure in women with estrogen-sensitive cancer undergoing ovarian stimulation for oocyte/embryo cryopreservation. There have been questions regarding whether the addition of AI and the presence of BRCA mutations affect cycle outcomes. We sought to determine the impact of letrozole and BRCA mutations on fertility preservation (FP) cycle outcomes of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with an antagonist protocol. Methods: The data were generated by the secondary analysis of a prospective database of all females diagnosed with cancer who underwent embryo or oocyte cryopreservation for FP. The final analysis included 145 patients stimulated with an antagonist protocol either using letrozole combined with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH; LF, n = 118) or rFSH alone (FA, n = 24). Results: The mean number of total (15.6 [7.9] vs 10.2 [7.8]; P = .004) and mature oocytes (10.4 [5.1] vs 7.8 [3.5]; P = .044) and embryos frozen (7.7 [5.3] vs 5.3 [2.7]; P = .043) were significantly higher after LF stimulation versus FA. In the LF group, women with BRCA mutations produced significantly fewer oocytes (11.0 [8.0] vs 16.4 [7.7], P = .015) and embryos (5.1 [4.4] vs 8.2 [4.7], P = .013), compared to those who were mutation negative. After adjusting for age, body mass index, baseline FSH level, and BRCA status, LF protocol still resulted in higher number of total oocytes (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9 to 3.6; P = .002) mature oocyte (95% CI: 0.3 to 1.4; P = .028), and embryo yield (95% CI: 0.7 to 1.4; P = .015). Conclusion: In women with cancer undergoing FP, letrozole appears to enhance response to ovarian stimulation while the presence of BRCA mutations is associated with lower oocyte and embryo yield.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 32
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of ovarian stimulation response in patients with breast cancer undergoing ovarian stimulation with letrozole and gonadotropins to patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins alone for elective cryopreservation of oocytes
    Pereira, Nigel
    Hancock, Kolbe
    Cordeiro, Christina N.
    Lekovich, Jovana P.
    Schattman, Glenn L.
    Rosenwaks, Zev
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 32 (10) : 823 - 826
  • [32] Outcomes of ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation in breast cancer patients with different hormonal receptor profiles
    Balayla, Jacques
    Tulandi, Togas
    Buckett, William
    Holzer, Hananel
    Steiner, Naama
    Shrem, Guy
    Volodarsky-Perel, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2020, 37 (04) : 913 - 921
  • [33] Outcomes of random-start letrozole protocol with PGT-A in women with breast cancer undergoing fertility preservation
    Turan, Volkan
    Gayete-Lafuente, Sonia
    Bang, Heejung
    Oktay, Kutluk H.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2023, 40 (10) : 2401 - 2408
  • [34] Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Initiated at Different Phases of the Menstrual Cycle for Fertility Preservation in Oncological Patients: a Retrospective Study
    Baig, A. Santolaria
    Camunas, N. Garcia
    Sanchez, P. Polo
    Nadal, J. Subira
    Fabuel, S. Monzo
    Rubio Rubio, J. M.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2023, 30 (08) : 2547 - 2553
  • [35] Variability in the Practice of Fertility Preservation for Patients with Cancer
    Reynolds, Kasey A.
    Grindler, Natalia M.
    Rhee, Julie S.
    Cooper, Amber R.
    Ratts, Valerie S.
    Carson, Kenneth R.
    Jungheim, Emily S.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (05):
  • [36] Effects of letrozole or tamoxifen coadministered with a standard stimulation protocol on fertility preservation among breast cancer patients
    Yael Shulman
    Benny Almog
    Yael Kalma
    Yuval Fouks
    Foad Azem
    Yoni Cohen
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2021, 38 : 743 - 750
  • [37] Ovarian stimulation response and fertility outcomes in patients with breast cancer across different stages, grades, and hormone receptor status for fertility preservation
    Liu, Shang-Min
    Huang, Shang-Yu
    Wu, Hsien-Ming
    Chang, Chia-Lin
    Huang, Hong-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2025, 124 (03) : 241 - 245
  • [38] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger increases the number of oocytes and embryos available for cryopreservation in cancer patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation
    Pereira, Nigel
    Kelly, Amelia G.
    Stone, Logan D.
    Witzke, Justine D.
    Lekovich, Jovana P.
    Elias, Rony T.
    Schattman, Glenn L.
    Rosenwaks, Zev
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (03) : 532 - 538
  • [39] Impact of BRCA mutations on outcomes among patients with serous endometrial cancer
    Kadan, Yfat
    Raviv, Oshrat
    Segev, Yakir
    Lavie, Ofer
    Bruchim, Ilan
    Fishman, Ami
    Michaelson, Rachel
    Beller, Uzi
    Helpman, Limor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 142 (01) : 91 - 96
  • [40] Ovarian stimulation and emergency in vitro fertilization for fertility preservation in cancer patients
    Michaan, Nadav
    Ben-David, Gila
    Ben-Yosef, Dalit
    Almog, Beni
    Many, Ariel
    Pauzner, David
    Lessing, Joseph B.
    Amit, Ami
    Azem, Foad
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2010, 149 (02) : 175 - 177