Ovarian Stimulation in Patients With Cancer: Impact of Letrozole and BRCA Mutations on Fertility Preservation Cycle Outcomes

被引:64
|
作者
Turan, Volkan [1 ,2 ]
Bedoschi, Giuliano [1 ,3 ]
Emirdar, Volkan [1 ]
Moy, Fred [1 ]
Oktay, Kutluk [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Innovat Inst Fertil & Vitro Fertilizat, New York, NY USA
[2] Yeni Yuzyil Univ, GOP Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Lab Mol Reprod & Fertil Preservat, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
BRCA; cancer; embryo cryopreservation; letrozole; ovarian response; BREAST-CANCER; IN-VITRO; EMBRYO CRYOPRESERVATION; REPAIR DEFICIENCY; WOMEN; GONADOTROPIN; AROMATASE; FOLLICLE; SAFETY; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1177/1933719117728800
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) have been introduced to reduce estrogen exposure in women with estrogen-sensitive cancer undergoing ovarian stimulation for oocyte/embryo cryopreservation. There have been questions regarding whether the addition of AI and the presence of BRCA mutations affect cycle outcomes. We sought to determine the impact of letrozole and BRCA mutations on fertility preservation (FP) cycle outcomes of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with an antagonist protocol. Methods: The data were generated by the secondary analysis of a prospective database of all females diagnosed with cancer who underwent embryo or oocyte cryopreservation for FP. The final analysis included 145 patients stimulated with an antagonist protocol either using letrozole combined with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH; LF, n = 118) or rFSH alone (FA, n = 24). Results: The mean number of total (15.6 [7.9] vs 10.2 [7.8]; P = .004) and mature oocytes (10.4 [5.1] vs 7.8 [3.5]; P = .044) and embryos frozen (7.7 [5.3] vs 5.3 [2.7]; P = .043) were significantly higher after LF stimulation versus FA. In the LF group, women with BRCA mutations produced significantly fewer oocytes (11.0 [8.0] vs 16.4 [7.7], P = .015) and embryos (5.1 [4.4] vs 8.2 [4.7], P = .013), compared to those who were mutation negative. After adjusting for age, body mass index, baseline FSH level, and BRCA status, LF protocol still resulted in higher number of total oocytes (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9 to 3.6; P = .002) mature oocyte (95% CI: 0.3 to 1.4; P = .028), and embryo yield (95% CI: 0.7 to 1.4; P = .015). Conclusion: In women with cancer undergoing FP, letrozole appears to enhance response to ovarian stimulation while the presence of BRCA mutations is associated with lower oocyte and embryo yield.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 32
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Random Start Ovarian Stimulation for Oocyte or Embryo Cryopreservation in Women Desiring Fertility Preservation Prior to Gonadotoxic Cancer Therapy
    Danis, Rachel B.
    Pereira, Nigel
    Elias, Rony T.
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 18 (08) : 609 - 613
  • [22] Fertility Preservation for Breast Cancer by Embryo-Cryo Preservation after ovarian Stimulation with Letrozole and FSH
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Findeklee, Sebastian
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2015, 191 (11) : 895 - 896
  • [23] Ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation with the use of aromatase inhibitors in women with breast cancer
    Reddy, Jhansi
    Oktay, Kutluk
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 98 (06) : 1363 - 1369
  • [24] Hereditary breast cancer and fertility preservation outcomes
    Arab, Suha
    Tulandi, Togas
    Buckett, William
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2022, 39 (05) : 1163 - 1168
  • [25] Circulating Tumor DNA to Interrogate the Safety of Letrozole-Associated Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Fertility Preservation in Breast Cancer Patients
    Rothe, Francoise
    Lambertini, Matteo
    Goldrat, Oranite
    Maetens, Marion
    Bareche, Yacine
    Blanc, Jeremy
    Rouas, Ghizlane
    Larsimont, Denis
    Sotiriou, Christos
    Ignatiadis, Michail
    Demeestere, Isabelle
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [26] Impact of BRCA mutations and hormone receptor status on reproductive potential in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation
    Kim, Sung Woo
    Kim, Tae Hee
    Han, Ji Yeon
    Kim, Seul Ki
    Lee, Jung Ryeol
    Jee, Ung Chul
    Suh, Chang Suk
    Kim, Seok Hyun
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 38 (03) : 227 - 230
  • [27] Fertility preservation for female cancer patients
    Harada, Miyuki
    Osuga, Yutaka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 24 (01) : 28 - 33
  • [28] The impact of letrozole administration on oocyte morphology in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation
    Bercaire, Ludmila M. N.
    Cavagna, Mario
    Donadio, Nilka F.
    Rocha, Andressa R.
    Portela, Rafael
    Alves, Vanessa R.
    Santos, Thamara B. B.
    Cavagna, Felipe
    Dzik, Artur
    Gebrim, Luiz H.
    Nahas, Eliana A. P.
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2020, 24 (03): : 257 - 264
  • [29] Timing of fertility preservation procedures in a cohort of female patients with cancer
    Jenninga, Esther
    Louwe, Leoni A.
    Peters, Alexander A. W.
    Nortier, Johan W. R.
    Hilders, Carina G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2012, 160 (02) : 170 - 173
  • [30] Sleep Disturbance and Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes in Infertility and Fertility Preservation Patients
    Lyttle, Brianna M. W.
    Lawson, Angela K.
    Klock, Susan
    Smith, Kristin
    Kazer, Ralph
    Hirshfeld-Cytron, Jennifer
    Pavone, Mary Ellen
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 63 (5-6) : 292 - 298