Quick and Simple FRAIL Scale Predicts Incident Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental ADL (IADL) Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:90
作者
Kojima, Gotaro [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, Royal Free Campus,Rowland Hill St, London NW3 2PF, England
关键词
Frailty; FRAIL scale; disability; ADL; IADL; DWELLING OLDER-PEOPLE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MORTALITY; HEALTH; VALIDATION; FALLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamda.2018.07.019
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: To quantitatively examine frailty defined by FRAIL scale as a predictor of incident disability risks by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: A systematic review was conducted using 4 electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) in April 2018 for prospective cohort studies of middle-aged or older people examining associations between frailty and incident disability. Reference lists of the included studies were hand-searched for additional studies. Authors of potentially eligible studies were contacted for additional data if necessary. Methodological quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Participants: Community-dwelling middle-aged and older people. Measurements: Incident risks of activities of daily living (ADL) or instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) disability according the FRAIL scale-defined frailty. Results: Seven studies provided odds ratios of incident disability risks according to frailty and were included in the meta-analysis. A random effects meta-analysis showed that frailty and prefrailty were significant predictors of ADL [pooled odds ratio (OR) = 9.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.71-20.46, P <.001 for frailty (FRAIL scale = 3-5) and pooled OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.77-2.45, P <.001 for prefrailty (FRAIL scale = 1-2) compared with robustness (FRAIL scale = 0); pooled OR = 4.44, 95% CI = 3.26-6.04, P <.001 for frailty compared with nonfrailty (FRAIL scale = 0-2)] and IADL (pooled OR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.67-3.73, P <.001, for frailty and pooled OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.10-2.77, P =.02, for prefrailty compared with robustness). There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions/Implications: The current study demonstrated that frailty status defined by the FRAIL scale was a significant predictor of disability among community-dwelling middle-aged and older individuals. In light of feasibility of the FRAIL scale, especially in a clinical setting, it may be a promising tool to facilitate the translation of frailty research into clinical practice. (C) 2018 AMDA e The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1063 / 1068
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Frailty assessment instruments: Systematic characterization of the uses and contexts of highly-cited instruments [J].
Buta, Brian J. ;
Walston, Jeremy D. ;
Godino, Job G. ;
Park, Minsun ;
Kalyani, Rita R. ;
Xue, Qian-Li ;
Bandeen-Roche, Karen ;
Varadhan, Ravi .
AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2016, 26 :53-61
[2]   Frailty: An Emerging Public Health Priority [J].
Cesari, Matteo ;
Prince, Martin ;
Thiyagarajan, Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli ;
De Carvalho, Islene Araujo ;
Bernabei, Roberto ;
Chan, Piu ;
Miguel Gutierrez-Robledo, Luis ;
Michel, Jean-Pierre ;
Morley, John E. ;
Ong, Paul ;
Manas, Leocadio Rodriguez ;
Sinclair, Alan ;
Won, Chang Won ;
Beard, John ;
Vellas, Bruno .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2016, 17 (03) :188-192
[3]   Frailty in elderly people [J].
Clegg, Andrew ;
Young, John ;
Iliffe, Steve ;
Rikkert, Marcel Olde ;
Rockwood, Kenneth .
LANCET, 2013, 381 (9868) :752-762
[4]   Validation of the FRAIL scale in Mexican elderly: results from the Mexican Health and Aging Study [J].
de Leon Gonzalez, Enrique Diaz ;
Gutierrez Hermosillo, Hugo ;
Martinez Beltran, Jesus Avilio ;
Medina Chavez, Juan Humberto ;
Palacios Corona, Rebeca ;
Salinas Garza, Deborah Patricia ;
Rodriguez Quintanilla, Karina Alejandra .
AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2016, 28 (05) :901-908
[5]   Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype [J].
Fried, LP ;
Tangen, CM ;
Walston, J ;
Newman, AB ;
Hirsch, C ;
Gottdiener, J ;
Seeman, T ;
Tracy, R ;
Kop, WJ ;
Burke, G ;
McBurnie, MA .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 56 (03) :M146-M156
[6]   Low Free Testosterone Predicts Frailty in Older Men: The Health in Men Study [J].
Hyde, Zoe ;
Flicker, Leon ;
Almeida, Osvaldo P. ;
Hankey, Graeme J. ;
McCaul, Kieran A. ;
Chubb, S. A. Paul ;
Yeap, Bu B. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2010, 95 (07) :3165-3172
[7]   Are the Kihon Checklist and the Kaigo-Yobo Checklist Compatible With the Frailty Index? [J].
Kojima, Gotaro ;
Taniguchi, Yu ;
Kitamura, Akihiko ;
Shinkai, Shoji .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 19 (09) :797-+
[8]   Frailty Defined by FRAIL Scale as a Predictor of Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Kojima, Gotaro .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 19 (06) :480-483
[9]   Frailty index as a predictor of mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Kojima, Gotaro ;
Iliffe, Steve ;
Walters, Kate .
AGE AND AGEING, 2018, 47 (02) :193-200
[10]   Frailty as a Predictor of Nursing Home Placement Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Kojima, Gotaro .
JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2018, 41 (01) :42-48