Single incision anterior apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic prolapse surgery at 36 months follow-up

被引:17
|
作者
Lo, Tsia-Shu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Al-Kharabsheh, Ahlam Mahmoud [4 ,5 ]
Tan, Yiap Loong [6 ]
Pue, Leng Boi [7 ]
Hsieh, Wu-Chiao [2 ,4 ]
Uy-Patrimonio, Ma. Clarissa [4 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr 222,Maijin Rd, Keelung 204, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Urogynecol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Linkou Med Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Urogynecol, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Mutah Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Al Karak, Jordan
[6] KPJ, Kuching Specialist Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
[7] Subang Jaya Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
[8] Dr Pablo O Torre Mem Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bacolod City, Philippines
来源
TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY | 2017年 / 56卷 / 06期
关键词
Sacrospinous fixation; Single incision mesh; Transvaginal mesh; Elevate A; URETHRAL CLOSURE PRESSURE; FEMALE URETHRA; TRANSVAGINAL MESH; SHORT-FORM; REPAIR; INCONTINENCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; COLPORRHAPHY; OUTCOMES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.tjog.2017.10.016
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy, recurrence, complications and quality of life changes 3 years after Elevate-A/single incision mesh surgery anterior apical (SIM A) and sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF) in the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Materials and methods: A prospective cohort study, 139 women, underwent transvaginal surgery for anterior and/or apical POP > stage 2, 69 patients had SIM A and 70 patients had SSF. The objective cure was defined as POP <= stage 1 anterior, apical according to POP-Q. Subjective cure is patient's negative feedback to question 2 and 3 of pelvic organ prolapse distress inventory 6 (POPDI-6). Patient's satisfaction was reported using validated quality of life questionnaires. Multi-channel urodynamic study was used to report any voiding problems related to the prolapse surgery 6 months after surgery. Results: 119 patients completed a minimum of 3 years follow-up. 89.8% is the overall prolapse correction success rate for SIM A and 73.3% for SSF group (p = 0.020), and 96.6% versus 73.4% at the anterior vaginal compartment respectively (p <= 0.001). Statistically significant difference was noticed in apical compartment with 98.3% with SIM A and 85.0% with SSF (p = 0.009). The subjective success rate, 86.4% in the SIM A and 70.0% in the SSF arm (p = 0.030) was significantly noted. Only, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 (POPDI-6) showed significant improvement. Operation time and intra-operative blood loss tend to be more with SIM A. Conclusion: SIM A has better 3 years objective and subjective cure rate than SSF in the anterior and/or apical compartment prolapse. (C) 2017 Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 800
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-Term Outcome of Anterior-Apical Mesh (Surelift) Versus Anterior Colporrhaphy and Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
    Lo, Tsia-Shu
    Rellora, Louiza Erika
    Rom, Eyal
    Chiung, Huan-Ka
    Yang, Chia-Hsuan
    Lin, Yi-Hao
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2025, : 857 - 866
  • [2] Combined anterior trans-obturator mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in women with severe prolapse—a case series of 30 months follow-up
    Tsia-Shu Lo
    Kiran Ashok
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2011, 22 : 299 - 306
  • [3] Combined anterior trans-obturator mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in women with severe prolapse-a case series of 30 months follow-up
    Lo, Tsia-Shu
    Ashok, Kiran
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 22 (03) : 299 - 306
  • [4] Anterior needle-guided mesh in advanced pelvic organ prolapse: apical fixation on sacrospinous ligaments
    Meuman, Neuman
    Natalia, Sumerova
    Vladimir, Sosnovski
    Jacob, Bornstein
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 172 : 120 - 123
  • [5] Transvaginal polypropylene mesh versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of uterine prolapse: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
    Lopes, Eliana Duarte
    de Barros Moreira Lemos, Nucelio Luiz
    Carramao, Silvia da Silva
    Lunardelli, Jacqueline Leme
    Cordeiro Ruano, Jose Maria
    Aoki, Tsutomu
    Flores Auge, Antonio Pedro
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 21 (04) : 389 - 394
  • [6] Single-incision mesh vs sacrospinous ligament fixation in posthysterectomy women at a three-year follow-up: a randomized trial
    Galad, J.
    Papcun, P.
    Dudic, R.
    Urdzik, P.
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2020, 121 (09): : 640 - 647
  • [7] Sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse in the era of vaginal mesh kits
    Yazdany, Tajnoos
    Wong, Keri
    Bhatia, Narender N.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 23 (05) : 391 - 395
  • [8] Comparison of the Efficacies of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension in the Treatment of Apical Prolapse: 24-Month Follow-Up Results
    Yurtcu, Engin
    Keyif, Betul
    Sarigedik, Burcu
    Basbug, Alper
    Tinelli, Andrea
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 52 (01)
  • [9] Comparison Between Anterior-Apical Mesh (Surelift) and Anterior Mesh (Surelift-A) in Transvaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: Surgical and Functional Outcomes at 1-Year Follow-Up
    Lo, Tsia-Shu
    Yang, Chia-Hsuan
    Rom, Eyal
    Rellora, Louiza Erika
    Jhang, Lan-Sin
    Hsieh, Wu-Chiao
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, : 2191 - 2202
  • [10] Modern role of sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse surgery-A systemic review
    Tseng, Ling-Hong
    Chen, Ilene
    Chang, Shuenn-Dyh
    Lee, Chyi-Long
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 52 (03): : 311 - 317