Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris

被引:0
作者
Tykocki, Tomasz [1 ]
Guzek, Krystyna [2 ]
Mandat, Tomasz [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Psychiatrii & Neurol, Klin Neurochirurg, PL-02957 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Szpital Wojewodzki, Oddzial Kardiologiczno Internistyczny, Poznan, Poland
[3] Inst Ctr Onkol, Klin Nowotworow Ukladu Nerwowego, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
refractory angina; spinal cord stimulation; coronary disease; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PAIN RELIEF; EFFICACY; REVASCULARIZATION; MANAGEMENT; PACEMAKER; SYMPTOMS; PATIENT; TRIALS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well known method of treatment used worldwide since the 80's of the last century. High efficiency of SCS was observed in the treatment of various types of pain. Promising clinical results were observed in the treatment of patients with refractory angina (RA). Reduction of angina attacks reduces closes of medications and improves quality of life. SCS efficacy in RA is comparable to that observed among patients treated with cardiac surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with lower risk of complications and rehospitalisation. SCS is more cost effective compared to CABG and PCI. SCS might be considered for patients who did not respond to reperfusion therapy. The mechanism of action in RA is not well understood. It is known that SCS reduces the activity of the sympathetic nervous system, by which improves the coronary perfusion and oxygenation of the heart muscle. It is important that SCS does not mask the pain related to the infarct.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 387
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
ANDERSON C, 1994, BRIT HEART J, V71, P419
[2]   Cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe angina pectoris -: Long-term results from the ESBY study [J].
Andréll, P ;
Ekre, O ;
Eliasson, T ;
Blomstrand, C ;
Börjesson, M ;
Nilsson, M ;
Mannheimer, C .
CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 99 (01) :20-24
[3]   Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation on angina symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina pectoris-results from the European Angina Registry Link Study (EARL) [J].
Andrell, P. ;
Yu, W. ;
Gersbach, P. ;
Gillberg, L. ;
Pehrsson, K. ;
Hardy, I. ;
Stahle, A. ;
Andersen, C. ;
Mannheimer, C. .
HEART, 2010, 96 (14) :1132-1136
[4]  
Broadley K. J., 2004, Autonomic & Autacoid Pharmacology, V24, P87, DOI 10.1111/j.1474-8673.2004.00324.x
[5]   Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review [J].
Cameron, T .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 100 (03) :254-267
[6]   EFFECT OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE-STIMULATION ON CORONARY BLOOD-FLOW [J].
CHAUHAN, A ;
MULLINS, PA ;
THURAISINGHAM, SI ;
TAYLOR, G ;
PETCH, MC ;
SCHOFIELD, PM .
CIRCULATION, 1994, 89 (02) :694-702
[7]   Spinal cord stimulation attenuates augmented dorsal horn release of excitatory amino acids in mononeuropathy via a GABAergic mechanism [J].
Cui, JG ;
OConnor, WT ;
Ungerstedt, U ;
Linderoth, B ;
Meyerson, BA .
PAIN, 1997, 73 (01) :87-95
[8]   EFFICACY OF SPINAL-CORD STIMULATION AS ADJUVANT THERAPY FOR INTRACTABLE ANGINA-PECTORIS - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-STUDY [J].
DEJONGSTE, MJL ;
HAUTVAST, RWM ;
HILLEGE, HL ;
LIE, KI .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1994, 23 (07) :1592-1597
[9]   Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial [J].
Dyer, M. T. ;
Goldsmith, K. A. ;
Khan, S. N. ;
Sharples, L. D. ;
Freeman, C. ;
Hardy, I. ;
Buxton, M. J. ;
Schofield, P. M. .
TRIALS, 2008, 9 (1)
[10]  
Eckert S, 2009, AM J CARDIOVASC DRUG, V9, P17, DOI 10.2165/00129784-200909010-00003