Maritime transportation risk analysis: Review and analysis in light of some foundational issues

被引:242
作者
Goerlandt, Floris [1 ]
Montewka, Jakub [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Appl Mech, Marine Technol,Res Grp Maritime Risk & Safety, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
关键词
Maritime transportation; Risk analysis principles; Foundational issues; Maritime safety; Maritime accident; FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT; SHIP COLLISION RISK; ONTOLOGICAL STATUS; PROBABILITY; MODEL; FREQUENCY; UNCERTAINTIES; ASSESSMENTS; STRAIT; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2015.01.025
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
literature. In parallel, there is a recent focus on foundational issues in risk analysis, with calls for intensified research on fundamental concepts and principles underlying the scientific field. This paper presents a review and analysis of risk definitions, perspectives and scientific approaches to risk analysis found in the maritime transportation application area, focusing on applications addressing accidental risk of shipping in a sea area. For this purpose, a classification of risk definitions, an overview of elements in risk perspectives and a classification of approaches to risk analysis science are applied. Results reveal that in the application area, risk is strongly tied to probability, both in definitions and perspectives, while alternative views exist. A diffuse situation is also found concerning the scientific approach to risk analysis, with realist, proceduralist and constructivist foundations co-existing. Realist approaches dominate the application area. Very few applications systematically account for uncertainty, neither concerning the evidence base nor in relation to the limitations of the risk model in relation to the space of possible outcomes. Some suggestions are made to improve the current situation, aiming to strengthen the scientific basis for risk analysis. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 134
页数:20
相关论文
共 140 条
[91]   Marine traffic risk modelling - an innovative approach and a case study [J].
Montewka, J. ;
Krata, P. ;
Goerlandt, F. ;
Mazaheri, A. ;
Kujala, P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2011, 225 (O3) :307-322
[92]  
Montewka J, 2012, MARINE SYSTEMS OCEAN, V7, P5
[93]   A framework for risk assessment for maritime transportation systems-A case study for open sea collisions involving RoPax vessels [J].
Montewka, Jakub ;
Ehlers, Soren ;
Goerlandt, Floris ;
Hinz, Tomasz ;
Tabri, Kristjan ;
Kujala, Pentti .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2014, 124 :142-157
[94]   Probability modelling of vessel collisions [J].
Montewka, Jakub ;
Hinz, Tomasz ;
Kujala, Pentti ;
Matusiak, Jerzy .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2010, 95 (05) :573-589
[95]   Study on collision avoidance in busy waterways by using AIS data [J].
Mou, Jun Min ;
van der Tak, Cees ;
Ligteringen, Han .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2010, 37 (5-6) :483-490
[96]   Development of ship sinking frequency model over Subsea Pipeline for Madura Strait using AIS data [J].
Mulyadi Y. ;
Kobayashi E. ;
Wakabayashi N. ;
Pitana T. ;
Wahyudi .
WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 2014, 13 (1) :43-59
[97]   Safety Risk Analysis of Maritime Transportation Review of the Literature [J].
Ozbas, Birnur .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2013, (2326) :32-38
[98]   Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment [J].
PateCornell, ME .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1996, 54 (2-3) :95-111
[99]  
Pedersen P.T., 1995, Collision and grounding mechanics, P125
[100]   Defining risk: Normative considerations [J].
Perhac, RM .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1996, 2 (02) :381-392