Storm-Time Evolution of the Equatorial Electron Pitch Angle Distributions in Earth's Outer Radiation Belt

被引:13
作者
Smirnov, Artem [1 ,2 ]
Shprits, Yuri [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Allison, Hayley [1 ]
Aseev, Nikita [1 ]
Drozdov, Alexander [3 ]
Kollmann, Peter [4 ]
Wang, Dedong [1 ]
Saikin, Anthony A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Potsdam, Inst Phys & Astron, Potsdam, Germany
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Earth Planetary & Space Sci, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Appl Phys Lab, Laurel, MD USA
关键词
pitch angle; pitch angle distributions; electrons; radiation belts; magnetosphere; van alien probes; GEOMAGNETIC STORMS; ULTRARELATIVISTIC ELECTRONS; EMPIRICAL-MODEL; DYNAMICS; ZONE;
D O I
10.3389/fspas.2022.836811
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
In this study we analyze the storm-time evolution of equatorial electron pitch angle distributions (PADs) in the outer radiation belt region using observations from the Magnetic Electron Ion Spectrometer (MagEIS) instrument aboard the Van Allen Probes in 2012-2019. The PADs are approximated using a sum of the first, third and fifth sine harmonics. Different combinations of the respective coefficients refer to the main PAD shapes within the outer radiation belt, namely the pancake, flat-top, butterfly and cap PADs. We conduct a superposed epoch analysis of 129 geomagnetic storms and analyze the PAD evolution for day and night MLT sectors. PAD shapes exhibit a strong energy-dependent response. At energies of tens of keV, the PADs exhibit little variation throughout geomagnetic storms. Cap PADs are mainly observed at energies < 300 keV, and their extent in L shrinks with increasing energy. The cap distributions transform into the pancake PADs around the main phase of the storm on the nightside, and then come back to their original shapes during the recovery phase. At higher energies on the dayside, the PADs are mainly pancake during pre-storm conditions and become more anisotropic during the main phase. The quiet-time butterfly PADs can be observed on the nightside at L> 5.6. During the main phase, butterfly PADs have stronger 90 degrees-minima and can be observed at lower L-shells (down to L = 5), then transitioning into flat-top PADs at L similar to 4.5 - 5 and pancake PADs at L < 4.5. The resulting PAD coefficients for different energies, locations and storm epochs can be used to test the wave models and physics-based radiation belt codes in terms of pitch angle distributions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Quasi-linear simulations of inner radiation belt electron pitch angle and energy distributions [J].
Albert, Jay M. ;
Starks, Michael J. ;
Horne, Richard B. ;
Meredith, Nigel P. ;
Glauert, Sarah A. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (06) :2381-2388
[2]   Determination of the Equatorial Electron Differential Flux From Observations at Low Earth Orbit [J].
Allison, Hayley J. ;
Horne, Richard B. ;
Glauert, Sarah A. ;
Del Zanna, Giulio .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2018, 123 (11) :9574-9596
[3]   Butterfly pitch angle distribution of relativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt: Evidence of nonadiabatic scattering [J].
Artemyev, A. V. ;
Agapitov, O. V. ;
Mozer, F. S. ;
Spence, H. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2015, 120 (06) :4279-4297
[4]   The Magnetic Electron Ion Spectrometer (MagEIS) Instruments Aboard the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) Spacecraft [J].
Blake, J. B. ;
Carranza, P. A. ;
Claudepierre, S. G. ;
Clemmons, J. H. ;
Crain, W. R., Jr. ;
Dotan, Y. ;
Fennell, J. F. ;
Fuentes, F. H. ;
Galvan, R. M. ;
George, J. S. ;
Henderson, M. G. ;
Lalic, M. ;
Lin, A. Y. ;
Looper, M. D. ;
Mabry, D. J. ;
Mazur, J. E. ;
McCarthy, B. ;
Nguyen, C. Q. ;
O'Brien, T. P. ;
Perez, M. A. ;
Redding, M. T. ;
Roeder, J. L. ;
Salvaggio, D. J. ;
Sorensen, G. A. ;
Spence, H. E. ;
Yi, S. ;
Zakrzewski, M. P. .
SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2013, 179 (1-4) :383-421
[5]   Statistical properties of the radiation belt seed population [J].
Boyd, A. J. ;
Spence, H. E. ;
Huang, C. -L. ;
Reeves, G. D. ;
Baker, D. N. ;
Turner, D. L. ;
Claudepierre, S. G. ;
Fennell, J. F. ;
Blake, J. B. ;
Shprits, Y. Y. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2016, 121 (08) :7636-7646
[6]   Pitch angle distributions of energetic electrons at Saturn [J].
Carbary, J. F. ;
Mitchell, D. G. ;
Paranicas, C. ;
Roelof, E. C. ;
Krimigis, S. M. ;
Krupp, N. ;
Khurana, K. ;
Dougherty, M. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2011, 116
[7]   Multisatellite determination of the relativistic electron phase space density at geosynchronous orbit: Methodology and results during geomagnetically quiet times [J].
Chen, Y ;
Friedel, RHW ;
Reeves, GD ;
Onsager, TG ;
Thomsen, MF .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2005, 110 (A10)
[8]   REPAD: An empirical model of pitch angle distributions for energetic electrons in the Earth's outer radiation belt [J].
Chen, Yue ;
Friedel, Reiner H. W. ;
Henderson, Michael G. ;
Claudepierre, Seth G. ;
Morley, Steven K. ;
Spence, Harlan E. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2014, 119 (03) :1693-1708
[9]   Evolution of electron pitch angle distributions across Saturn's middle magnetospheric region from MIMI/LEMMS [J].
Clark, G. ;
Paranicas, C. ;
Santos-Costa, D. ;
Livi, S. ;
Krupp, N. ;
Mitchell, D. G. ;
Roussos, E. ;
Tseng, W. -L. .
PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2014, 104 :18-28
[10]   Storm Time Depletions of Multi-MeV Radiation Belt Electrons Observed at Different Pitch Angles [J].
Drozdov, A. Y. ;
Aseev, N. ;
Effenberger, F. ;
Turner, D. L. ;
Saikin, A. ;
Shprits, Y. Y. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2019, 124 (11) :8943-8953