A qualitative study of social sciences faculty research workflows

被引:6
作者
Ince, Sharon [1 ]
Hoadley, Christopher [2 ]
Kirschner, Paul A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Seton Hall Univ, Univ Lib, S Orange, NJ 07079 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Adm Leadership & Technol, New York, NY USA
[3] Open Univ, Heerlen, Netherlands
关键词
Research workflows; Faculty; Social sciences; Information literacy; Search; Information management; Knowledge management; Scholarly communications; INFORMATION-SEEKING; SCHOLARS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1108/JD-08-2021-0168
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper is a qualitative study of how social sciences faculty construct their research workflows with the help of technological tools. The purpose of this study is to examine faculty scholarly workflows and how both tools and practices support the research process. This paper could inform academic libraries on how to support scholars throughout the research process. Design/methodology/approach This is a qualitative study case study of ten faculty members from six research universities from the United States and Canada. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and recorded. Atlas.ti was used to code and analyze the transcripts; each participant was a separate case. Descriptive coding was used to identify digital tools used for collaboration; process and descriptive coding was utilized to examine practices in scholarly workflows. Findings Through case study analysis the results of this study include the role of technology in faculty research workflows. Each workflow was grouped into four categories: information literacy, information management, knowledge management, and scholarly communication. The findings included scholars creating simple workflows for efficiency and collaboration and utilizing workarounds. Research limitations/implications The study did not observe faculty in the process of doing research and, thus, only reports on what the researchers say that they do. Originality/value The research is unique in that there is almost no research on how social scientists conduct their research workflows and the affordances/impasses of this process.
引用
收藏
页码:1321 / 1337
页数:17
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
American Library Association (ALA), 2003, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT
[2]  
American Library Association (ALA), 2016, FRAM INF LIT HIGH ED
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, The Social Life of Information
[4]  
Antonijevic S, 2015, AMONGST DIGITAL HUMANISTS: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY OF DIGITAL KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION, DOI 10.1057/9781137484185
[5]  
Antonijevic S, 2018, DIGIT HUMANITIES Q, V12
[6]   Personal Library Curation: An Ethnographic Study of Scholars' Information Practices [J].
Antonijevic, Smiljana ;
Cahoy, Ellysa Stern .
PORTAL-LIBRARIES AND THE ACADEMY, 2014, 14 (02) :287-306
[7]  
Bakhtin M., 1984, Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics
[8]  
Bauder J., 2012, Internet References Services Quarterly, V17, P65, DOI DOI 10.1080/10875301.2012.718316
[9]  
Berry T.U., 2020, Public Services Quarterly, V16, P71, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15228959.2019.1687070, 10.1080/15228959.2019.1687070]
[10]  
Bosman J., NAT RES M OP SCI NAT, DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.5065534